|
| |||
| Show 2003 style menu's Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", "View", etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the Office XP shortcuts. I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse to perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. Arg! Thanks in advance |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > "View", > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the Office > XP > shortcuts. > > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse > to > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. > > Arg! > > Thanks in advance Almost all of the Alt+key combinations that were in Office XP or Office 2003 are useable in Office 2007. There is no Microsoft supplied way to get rid of the ribbon bar but there is add-on programs you can purchase that will do what you want. You will need to Google for them. |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's see this page http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free toolbar thing for word etc there are also other options that are not free (see post) "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > "View", > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the Office > XP > shortcuts. > > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse > to > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. > > Arg! > > Thanks in advance |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's Thanks I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon bar. You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are evidently disabled. I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, customers. I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute No-No. Thanks for the suggestion. "Someone" wrote: > see this page > > http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html > > scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free toolbar > thing for word etc > > there are also other options that are not free (see post) > > "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office > > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > > "View", > > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the Office > > XP > > shortcuts. > > > > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse > > to > > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more > > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. > > > > Arg! > > > > Thanks in advance > > |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's well that’s the only one that is free... its better than nothing. The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third party software) to use the ribbon! The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely hate it. "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... > Thanks > > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon > bar. > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are > evidently > disabled. > > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with > their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, > customers. > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute > No-No. > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > "Someone" wrote: > >> see this page >> >> http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html >> >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free >> toolbar >> thing for word etc >> >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) >> >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in >> > Office >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", >> > "View", >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the >> > Office >> > XP >> > shortcuts. >> > >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a >> > mouse >> > to >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times >> > more >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do >> > instantly. >> > >> > Arg! >> > >> > Thanks in advance >> >> |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's "Someone" <some - one@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:gkqfh6$6rv$1@news.motzarella.org... > > The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely > hate it. But the reason it was introduced is pretty logical..... http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archiv...he-ribbon.aspx -- Asking a question? Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about, your OS, Service Pack level and the FULL contents of any error message(s) |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's "The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely hate it. " Correct! It certainly appears as though novice users like it and power/longtime users don't, by and large. The latter group is very used to accessing the menu options via keystrokes, rather than a mouse, which is always a slower alternative. I truly feel sorry for the captive users, who are forced to use it because their employer "upgraded" to Office 2007. Bill Gates made it quite clear some time ago that future versions of Windows would be using the Ribbon extensively. However, I must say the Vista team was smart enough to provide the classic option for the Start menu. The above comment about the access speed applies to the Start menu as well. "The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.." Correct once again! That was an arrogant and ill-advised move. That, and the fact that now Office doesn't come bundled with new computers, has prompted long time users to look into other alternatives, such as OpenOffice. MS couldn't have done a better job of promoting alternative office suites. However, had MS provided a classic menu alternative, they would not be able to claim widespread adoption of the Ribbon interface, never mind the captive users. -- Gemini "Someone" wrote: > well that’s the only one that is free... > > its better than nothing. > > The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. > > And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its > already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third party > software) to use the ribbon! > > The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely > hate it. > > "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... > > Thanks > > > > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon > > bar. > > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. > > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are > > evidently > > disabled. > > > > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with > > their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, > > customers. > > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute > > No-No. > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > "Someone" wrote: > > > >> see this page > >> > >> http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html > >> > >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free > >> toolbar > >> thing for word etc > >> > >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) > >> > >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in > >> > Office > >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > >> > "View", > >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the > >> > Office > >> > XP > >> > shortcuts. > >> > > >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a > >> > mouse > >> > to > >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times > >> > more > >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do > >> > instantly. > >> > > >> > Arg! > >> > > >> > Thanks in advance > >> > >> > |
| |||
| RE: Show 2003 style menu's Harry, there are other alternatives to the one posted thus far. You should be able to find them via Google and/or searching this newsgroup. You aren't the first one to be asking about this. Sorry I can't help any more. After using the Office 2007 trial version for a few weeks, I decided to go back to Office 2003. During that time, I did try out a couple of these add-on alternatives and didn't find them very useful. Oh yes, you may want to let MS and Jensen Harris (he led the team that came up with the Ribbon UI) know your opinion. If you follow the link to JH's blog that's been posted, you'll be able to send him an email from there. Good luck! -- Gemini "Harry" wrote: > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", "View", > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the Office XP > shortcuts. > > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse to > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. > > Arg! > > Thanks in advance |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's This one offers a free version: http://pschmid.net/office2007/ribbon...er/starter.php -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. ALWAYS post your Outlook version. How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/KB/555375 After furious head scratching, Someone asked: | well that’s the only one that is free... | | its better than nothing. | | The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI | without having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. | | And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its | already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even | third party software) to use the ribbon! | | The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some | absolutely hate it. | | "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message | news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... || Thanks || || I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the || ribbon bar. || You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 || Menu. Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts || are evidently || disabled. || || I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's || interact with their application. It totally screws up their || regular, long time, customers. || I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an || absolute No-No. || || Thanks for the suggestion. || || "Someone" wrote: || ||| see this page ||| ||| http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html ||| ||| scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free ||| toolbar ||| thing for word etc ||| ||| there are also other options that are not free (see post) ||| ||| "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message ||| news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... |||| Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in |||| Office |||| 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", |||| "Edit", "View", |||| etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the |||| Office |||| XP |||| shortcuts. |||| |||| I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a |||| mouse |||| to |||| perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 |||| times more |||| effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do |||| instantly. |||| |||| Arg! |||| |||| Thanks in advance |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's Hi Harry, You’ll find at least five products listed on Microsoft Office Marketplace if you search as: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:...r=all&filter=0 Regards, Fanfoe On Jan 16, 3:33*am, Harry <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > Thanks > > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon bar. * > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. * > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are evidently > disabled. > > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with > their application. *It totally screws up their regular, long time, customers. > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute No-No. > > Thanks for the suggestion. * > > > > "Someone" wrote: > > see this page > > >http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...d-menus-and-to... > > > scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free toolbar > > thing for word etc > > > there are also other options that are not free (see post) > > > "Harry" <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > > > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in Office > > > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > > > "View", > > > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? *Hooefully using the Office > > > XP > > > shortcuts. > > > > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a mouse > > > to > > > perform tasks extremely annoying. *Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times more > > > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do instantly. > > > > Arg! > > > > Thanks in advance- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's Windows 7 Beta 1 does not have the classic start menu Surprise surprise.. That would make a few million mad.. LOL "Gemini" <Gemini@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:FCCEFD61-D747-497E-8111-A0E43E2BDB2E@microsoft.com... > "The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some > absolutely > hate it. " > > Correct! It certainly appears as though novice users like it and > power/longtime users don't, by and large. The latter group is very used to > accessing the menu options via keystrokes, rather than a mouse, which is > always a slower alternative. I truly feel sorry for the captive users, who > are forced to use it because their employer "upgraded" to Office 2007. > > Bill Gates made it quite clear some time ago that future versions of > Windows would be using the Ribbon extensively. However, I must say the > Vista > team was smart enough to provide the classic option for the Start menu. > The > above comment about the access speed applies to the Start menu as well. > > "The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.." > Correct once again! That was an arrogant and ill-advised move. That, and > the > fact that now Office doesn't come bundled with new computers, has prompted > long time users to look into other alternatives, such as OpenOffice. MS > couldn't have done a better job of promoting alternative office suites. > However, had MS provided a classic menu alternative, they would not be > able > to claim widespread adoption of the Ribbon interface, never mind the > captive > users. > > -- Gemini > > > "Someone" wrote: > >> well that’s the only one that is free... >> >> its better than nothing. >> >> The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without >> having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. >> >> And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its >> already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third >> party >> software) to use the ribbon! >> >> The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some >> absolutely >> hate it. >> >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... >> > Thanks >> > >> > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon >> > bar. >> > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. >> > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are >> > evidently >> > disabled. >> > >> > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact >> > with >> > their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, >> > customers. >> > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute >> > No-No. >> > >> > Thanks for the suggestion. >> > >> > "Someone" wrote: >> > >> >> see this page >> >> >> >> http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html >> >> >> >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free >> >> toolbar >> >> thing for word etc >> >> >> >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) >> >> >> >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... >> >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in >> >> > Office >> >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", >> >> > "View", >> >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the >> >> > Office >> >> > XP >> >> > shortcuts. >> >> > >> >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a >> >> > mouse >> >> > to >> >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 >> >> > times >> >> > more >> >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do >> >> > instantly. >> >> > >> >> > Arg! >> >> > >> >> > Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> >> |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's On Jan 16, 9:23*am, "Someone" <some - o...@microsoft.com> wrote: > well that’s the only one that is free... > > its better than nothing. > > The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. > > And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its > already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third party > software) to use the ribbon! > > The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely > hate it. > > "Harry" <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... > > > > > Thanks > > > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon > > bar. > > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. > > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are > > evidently > > disabled. > > > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with > > their application. *It totally screws up their regular, long time, > > customers. > > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute > > No-No. > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > "Someone" wrote: > > >> see this page > > >>http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...d-menus-and-to.... > > >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free > >> toolbar > >> thing for word etc > > >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) > > >> "Harry" <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >>news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in > >> > Office > >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > >> > "View", > >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? *Hooefully using the > >> > Office > >> > XP > >> > shortcuts. > > >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a > >> > mouse > >> > to > >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. *Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times > >> > more > >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do > >> > instantly. > > >> > Arg! > > >> > Thanks in advance- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I share your frustation. I had a really practical Excel program that generated its own menus and I thought I had just finished three years of developing it when poof - the ribbon came along, and I had to start from scratch. I know you could access the menus still, but they are now hidden, and no longer user friendly. I am still working on the redesign. My program was used by 'soccer moms' with little computer experience, and darn it if MicroSoft did not make years of my work go down the drain. The alternate menu approach is impractical too, because as time moves forward, new users will learn how to work with the ribbon. But after months of fiddling, I still cannot get the print options in 07 to work the way they did in 03 - I have to load my program into Excel 03 and make the changes, then bring it back to 07. It is so frustrating, but what choice do we have? None. Hate it - too strong a word. But frustrated understates it. |
| |||
| Re: Show 2003 style menu's "Windows 7 Beta 1 does not have the classic start menu " There's no option to switch to the classic menus in the Start Menu Settings panel??? "That would make a few million mad.. LOL" No kidding. -- Gemini "Someone" wrote: > Windows 7 Beta 1 does not have the classic start menu > > Surprise surprise.. > > That would make a few million mad.. LOL > > "Gemini" <Gemini@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:FCCEFD61-D747-497E-8111-A0E43E2BDB2E@microsoft.com... > > "The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some > > absolutely > > hate it. " > > > > Correct! It certainly appears as though novice users like it and > > power/longtime users don't, by and large. The latter group is very used to > > accessing the menu options via keystrokes, rather than a mouse, which is > > always a slower alternative. I truly feel sorry for the captive users, who > > are forced to use it because their employer "upgraded" to Office 2007. > > > > Bill Gates made it quite clear some time ago that future versions of > > Windows would be using the Ribbon extensively. However, I must say the > > Vista > > team was smart enough to provide the classic option for the Start menu. > > The > > above comment about the access speed applies to the Start menu as well. > > > > "The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > > having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.." > > Correct once again! That was an arrogant and ill-advised move. That, and > > the > > fact that now Office doesn't come bundled with new computers, has prompted > > long time users to look into other alternatives, such as OpenOffice. MS > > couldn't have done a better job of promoting alternative office suites. > > However, had MS provided a classic menu alternative, they would not be > > able > > to claim widespread adoption of the Ribbon interface, never mind the > > captive > > users. > > > > -- Gemini > > > > > > "Someone" wrote: > > > >> well that’s the only one that is free... > >> > >> its better than nothing. > >> > >> The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > >> having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. > >> > >> And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its > >> already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third > >> party > >> software) to use the ribbon! > >> > >> The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some > >> absolutely > >> hate it. > >> > >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon > >> > bar. > >> > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. > >> > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are > >> > evidently > >> > disabled. > >> > > >> > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact > >> > with > >> > their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, > >> > customers. > >> > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute > >> > No-No. > >> > > >> > Thanks for the suggestion. > >> > > >> > "Someone" wrote: > >> > > >> >> see this page > >> >> > >> >> http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...olbars-or.html > >> >> > >> >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free > >> >> toolbar > >> >> thing for word etc > >> >> > >> >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) > >> >> > >> >> "Harry" <Harry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > >> >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in > >> >> > Office > >> >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > >> >> > "View", > >> >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the > >> >> > Office > >> >> > XP > >> >> > shortcuts. > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a > >> >> > mouse > >> >> > to > >> >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 > >> >> > times > >> >> > more > >> >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do > >> >> > instantly. > >> >> > > >> >> > Arg! > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks in advance > >> >> > >> >> > >> > |
| |||
| Even more than that! I hear you! I had a very elaborate excel spreadsheet with macro's and conditional formatting that took 2 years to progress to current (it's an ongoing personal project), and now, with 2007; 1. Conditional formatting in 2007 is NOT the same as 2003. When they "convert" to the new format, it shuffles the order of some of the conditions (of course, not all), and as anyone who uses them knows, the order is almost as critical as the condition itself. It took 3 or 4 days to figure out that the colors I was using to help predict certain conditions were not always accurate, and another 2 or 3 to track it down to condition order. 2. Another conditional formatting issue is that you can no longer copy a condition to another cell, using relative references to allow it to adjust for its new position. At least, not if the cells are adjacent (haven't tried elsewhere). When I tried, it automatically changed the format range to include the new cell, and from what I can determine, you cannot divorce it from that group - meaning you can't then customize it for the new cell - you must re-enter all conditions, colors, etc from scratch. 3. Another HUGE issue is that on 2007 the macro takes almost 10 times longer to run. No joke! I've timed it! Originally it took about 15 seconds, with 5-10 of that used to paste in a large other application copy buffer, and the rest with cursors and sheets flashing until done. Now it takes about 30 seconds to paste the buffer it, and each cell movement to accomplish the tasks is readable as it proceeds. Net result is now the macro takes from 1 minute to 3. Admittedly, this problem could also be Office's interaction with Vista, or Vista entirely. Doesn't really matter since it almost eliminates the usefullness of the macro. I'm actually disgusted enough with this heap (and extremely disappointed with Microsoft for this crap as well as the Vista fiasco), that I'm just going to try and find a left over copy of Office XP. That product works! "RJQMAN" wrote: > On Jan 16, 9:23 am, "Someone" <some - o...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > well that’s the only one that is free... > > > > its better than nothing. > > > > The big no no was that microsoft forced the ribbon on the 2007 UI without > > having a backwards option to have the classic toobars.. > > > > And in the new Windows7 they plan on having more and more of this (its > > already on paint and wordpad).. in fact they want EVERYONE (even third party > > software) to use the ribbon! > > > > The ribbon speed of use is questionable.. some like it and some absolutely > > hate it. > > > > "Harry" <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > > > news:48D575C0-338C-4AFE-9D91-AAE69242C0B3@microsoft.com... > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > I downloaded the mentioned menu add-on, but it's worse than the ribbon > > > bar. > > > You have to manually click on the "Add-on" tab to reveal the 2003 Menu. > > > Then, you have to click on the menu option since all shortcuts are > > > evidently > > > disabled. > > > > > I absolutely hate when devepers completely change how user's interact with > > > their application. It totally screws up their regular, long time, > > > customers. > > > I was in application development for 20 years, and that was an absolute > > > No-No. > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > > "Someone" wrote: > > > > >> see this page > > > > >>http://computerboom.blogspot.com/200...d-menus-and-to.... > > > > >> scroll down to where there is EDIT in red color text to get a free > > >> toolbar > > >> thing for word etc > > > > >> there are also other options that are not free (see post) > > > > >> "Harry" <Ha...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > >>news:1AF458DC-8ED0-4437-BA1A-7CBF238E85EC@microsoft.com... > > >> > Is there anyway to get rid of the annoying (and huge) icon bar in > > >> > Office > > >> > 2007, and have it show the standard windows menu bar "File", "Edit", > > >> > "View", > > >> > etc, that can be triggered using "ALT" codes? Hooefully using the > > >> > Office > > >> > XP > > >> > shortcuts. > > > > >> > I'm a touch typist, and I find this trend of forcing users to use a > > >> > mouse > > >> > to > > >> > perform tasks extremely annoying. Mouse clicks require 5 or 10 times > > >> > more > > >> > effort and time to accomplish what a 1 second >Alt<-Key can do > > >> > instantly. > > > > >> > Arg! > > > > >> > Thanks in advance- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > I share your frustation. I had a really practical Excel program that > generated its own menus and I thought I had just finished three years > of developing it when poof - the ribbon came along, and I had to start > from scratch. I know you could access the menus still, but they are > now hidden, and no longer user friendly. I am still working on the > redesign. My program was used by 'soccer moms' with little computer > experience, and darn it if MicroSoft did not make years of my work go > down the drain. The alternate menu approach is impractical too, > because as time moves forward, new users will learn how to work with > the ribbon. But after months of fiddling, I still cannot get the > print options in 07 to work the way they did in 03 - I have to load my > program into Excel 03 and make the changes, then bring it back to 07. > It is so frustrating, but what choice do we have? None. Hate it - > too strong a word. But frustrated understates it. > |
| |||
| Software available Thanks, I'll check 'em out. I doubt I'll get any of them, though. Besides the belief that the original should work without add-on's (basic functions), every time I add new "enhancement" packages to office, or the Microsoft OS for that matter, I end up with a mess of conflicting drivers, missing files, etc. Besides; I'm beyond broke. It took 6 months to scrape the $ for Office 2007! I had to do upgrade because they would no longer honor the installation key for Office XP (I had been moving it from PC to PC - uninstalling between each one), since my laptops usually only last about 6-9 months, and they said no more. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CSS TD element style overrides Table class style. | TPC | General Questions | 0 | 11-10-2008 10:40 AM |
| CSS TD element style overrides Table class style. | TPC | General Questions | 0 | 11-10-2008 05:00 AM |
| Show Start Menu's "All Programs" in two panes | hmm | Windows XP | 5 | 10-17-2008 05:19 AM |
| Office 2003 Memo Style Printing | Denny M | Microsoft Office | 0 | 12-31-2007 11:40 AM |
| Changing Print Style on Outlook 2003 calendar | ARGO | Microsoft Office | 0 | 05-18-2007 11:41 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |