|
| |||
| Microsoft Office 2007 Vs. 2003 - Which way? I currently have Word, Office, Excell, Powerpoint & Outlook 2003 on a system formerly used at my office, and is now used at home. This software is "leased" monthly, at a cost which makes the purchase of my own Office suite far more cost-effective, and soon, I must "W.I.P.E." it from the hard drive. Since I want to continue using the above programs, I must purchase and install it on a system with data saved in the "old" format (compared to what I understand the 2007 version uses). If I purchase the 2007 version - leaving aside for the moment a new learning curve, I've learned the new version won't be able to read doc's producred under the "old" version, without some sort of conversion program to allow it. I don't really use all the features of all the above programs, but I do use some within each. Not sure I need to pop for the newer version here, particularly since the system It will be installed on is already 3 years old, and likely will be in use for another 3-4 years before IT is replaced with the next hand-me-down, recycled computer. If I move forward with the 2007 version, it likely would beMicrosoft Office Professional 2007, since its features would permit me the ability to work on projects, etc., at home. Please note here, too, that my office system uses the 2003 version, and to date, I have not been advised of any plans to upgrade to the 2007 versions of these programs in the near future. What issues should I be considering, and under the circumstances, what might you recommend? |
| |||
| Re: Microsoft Office 2007 Vs. 2003 - Which way? 2007 reads 2003 docs without any problems, or 'extras' 2007 can save in old format "Michael J" <Michael J@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2CB4ED6A-57A3-41F3-B322-93D1823AC4BF@microsoft.com... >I currently have Word, Office, Excell, Powerpoint & Outlook 2003 on a >system > formerly used at my office, and is now used at home. This software is > "leased" monthly, at a cost which makes the purchase of my own Office > suite > far more cost-effective, and soon, I must "W.I.P.E." it from the hard > drive. > > Since I want to continue using the above programs, I must purchase and > install it on a system with data saved in the "old" format (compared to > what > I understand the 2007 version uses). If I purchase the 2007 version - > leaving > aside for the moment a new learning curve, I've learned the new version > won't > be able to read doc's producred under the "old" version, without some sort > of > conversion program to allow it. > > I don't really use all the features of all the above programs, but I do > use > some within each. Not sure I need to pop for the newer version here, > particularly since the system It will be installed on is already 3 years > old, > and likely will be in use for another 3-4 years before IT is replaced with > the next hand-me-down, recycled computer. > > If I move forward with the 2007 version, it likely would beMicrosoft > Office > Professional 2007, since its features would permit me the ability to work > on > projects, etc., at home. Please note here, too, that my office system uses > the 2003 version, and to date, I have not been advised of any plans to > upgrade to the 2007 versions of these programs in the near future. > > What issues should I be considering, and under the circumstances, what > might > you recommend? |
| |||
| Re: Microsoft Office 2007 Vs. 2003 - Which way? Firstly, Office 2007 can open and edit documents created in earlier verions! It would be a (worse) nightmare otherwise. Office 2007 can save documents in the older format as well. In fact, you can set an option to default to the older formats, so you will have compatability with your office. That said, your decision comes down to availability of the 2003 version, how soon your office/partners will convert to '07, and how much pain you can put up with in learning the new version. I've not found any compelling new features in '07 that make me want to rush out and buy more of it. And, as a side note, for users of '03 who get documents in the '07 format, you can download free converter from MS that will allow you to open the newer docs. Val "Michael J" <Michael J@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:2CB4ED6A-57A3-41F3-B322-93D1823AC4BF@microsoft.com... I currently have Word, Office, Excell, Powerpoint & Outlook 2003 on a system formerly used at my office, and is now used at home. This software is "leased" monthly, at a cost which makes the purchase of my own Office suite far more cost-effective, and soon, I must "W.I.P.E." it from the hard drive. Since I want to continue using the above programs, I must purchase and install it on a system with data saved in the "old" format (compared to what I understand the 2007 version uses). If I purchase the 2007 version - leaving aside for the moment a new learning curve, I've learned the new version won't be able to read doc's producred under the "old" version, without some sort of conversion program to allow it. I don't really use all the features of all the above programs, but I do use some within each. Not sure I need to pop for the newer version here, particularly since the system It will be installed on is already 3 years old, and likely will be in use for another 3-4 years before IT is replaced with the next hand-me-down, recycled computer. If I move forward with the 2007 version, it likely would beMicrosoft Office Professional 2007, since its features would permit me the ability to work on projects, etc., at home. Please note here, too, that my office system uses the 2003 version, and to date, I have not been advised of any plans to upgrade to the 2007 versions of these programs in the near future. What issues should I be considering, and under the circumstances, what might you recommend? |
| |||
| Re: Microsoft Office 2007 Vs. 2003 - Which way? To Echo a bit what Val say but go a stage further. Yes for me I agree there's no compelling reason to move from 2003 to 2007. In fact I think there's a compelling reason to stay on 2003 - 2007 is still very flaky in places and the new user interface using the ribbon makes no sense tome what so ever. My own advice - go with 2003, there are file converters available. Phil. "Val" wrote: > Firstly, Office 2007 can open and edit documents created in earlier verions! > It would be a (worse) nightmare otherwise. > > Office 2007 can save documents in the older format as well. In fact, you > can set an option to default to the older formats, so you will have > compatability with your office. > > That said, your decision comes down to availability of the 2003 version, how > soon your office/partners will convert to '07, and how much pain you can put > up with in learning the new version. I've not found any compelling new > features in '07 that make me want to rush out and buy more of it. > > And, as a side note, for users of '03 who get documents in the '07 format, > you can download free converter from MS that will allow you to open the > newer docs. > > Val > > "Michael J" <Michael J@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:2CB4ED6A-57A3-41F3-B322-93D1823AC4BF@microsoft.com... > I currently have Word, Office, Excell, Powerpoint & Outlook 2003 on a system > formerly used at my office, and is now used at home. This software is > "leased" monthly, at a cost which makes the purchase of my own Office suite > far more cost-effective, and soon, I must "W.I.P.E." it from the hard drive. > > Since I want to continue using the above programs, I must purchase and > install it on a system with data saved in the "old" format (compared to what > I understand the 2007 version uses). If I purchase the 2007 version - > leaving > aside for the moment a new learning curve, I've learned the new version > won't > be able to read doc's producred under the "old" version, without some sort > of > conversion program to allow it. > > I don't really use all the features of all the above programs, but I do use > some within each. Not sure I need to pop for the newer version here, > particularly since the system It will be installed on is already 3 years > old, > and likely will be in use for another 3-4 years before IT is replaced with > the next hand-me-down, recycled computer. > > If I move forward with the 2007 version, it likely would beMicrosoft Office > Professional 2007, since its features would permit me the ability to work on > projects, etc., at home. Please note here, too, that my office system uses > the 2003 version, and to date, I have not been advised of any plans to > upgrade to the 2007 versions of these programs in the near future. > > What issues should I be considering, and under the circumstances, what might > you recommend? > > > |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading Office 2003->Office 2007 trial: what happens to my Outlook 2003 .pst file? | David Wess | Microsoft Office | 7 | 02-02-2009 05:30 AM |
| I downloaded Microsoft Office 2007, I want my old 2003 version bac | Becky | Microsoft Office | 4 | 05-29-2008 07:00 AM |
| Microsoft Office 2003 and 2007 crashes when managing EMF (enhanced metafiles) | VicenT | Microsoft Office | 2 | 06-10-2007 07:21 AM |
| upgarde to microsoft 2007 from recent purchase of office 2003 | colleenarn@msn.com | Microsoft Office | 2 | 02-19-2007 06:31 AM |
| How can I upgrade my Microsoft Office 2003 suite to the 2007 ed? | pratt | Microsoft Office | 1 | 01-19-2007 12:45 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |