On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:10:39 +0000, §ñühw¤£f wrote:

> I balme Bill Gates.

Yuor spall che><0r is t3h b0rk3n :)

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:49:35 +0000, jellybean stonerfish wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:10:39 +0000, §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> I balme Bill Gates.
>
> Yuor spall che><0r is t3h b0rk3n :)

No, no, no! Wolfie will balme anyone if they pay him enough.

--
Ubuntu 9.04 (2.6.28-15)

Aragorn <aragorn@chatfactory.invalid> wrote:

>See, when MICROS~1 releases a new version of their Wintendo GameOS, this
>new version requires all new hardware if you want to run it any faster
>than the experience of running DOS on a harddiskless IBM PC with a 4.77
>MHz 8086/8088 processor and two 5.25" floppy drives. This means that
>this new release of Wintendo GameOS actively promotes and stimulates
>the purchase of new hardware, which is rewarded by the hardware
>manufacturers by their vow to support Wintendo GameOS only.

Modern Warfare 2 is to be released in a month, the prestige edition
($150) comes with fully functional night vision goggles.

Just last week all versions of the prestige edition were canceled but
the Xbox version. MICROS~1 apparently made a deal $$$ with Infinity
Ward (creators of MW2).
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/modern-warf...stige-edition/
Others in the UK have reported the same thing (this for the PC
version) while the link still claims only the U.S. prestige edition
has been canceled.

MW2 is suppose to be on the same level, if not better than Halo, and
I'm sure your aware of what Halo 1 did for the Xbox. This isn't about
hardware per se, it's about saleing more Xbox's.

Two days later the PS3 was offering the MW2 prestige edition, I don't
know the background of what happened, but I figure MICROS~1 had to
relent at least to the PS3, or face antitrust charges they couldn't
defend.

Had to interject, this tactic ticks me off, I wanted to start
practicing driving without lights. :)





--

http://i36.tinypic.com/14dq4u9.jpg

§ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote:

># Settings for wacom cursor (mouse)

You have a wacom? I'd run windows just to use Photoshop.



--

http://i36.tinypic.com/14dq4u9.jpg

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC), ???hw??f
<snuhwolf@netscape.net>wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:37:47 -0400, Meat Plow pinched out a steaming pile
>of:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:15:15 -0600, ???hw??f
>> <snuhwolf@netscape.net>wrote:
>>
>>>In message <36mtjk.in2.17.14@news.alt.net>, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:34:45 -0600, ???hw??f
>>>> <snuhwolf@netscape.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >So I tried an Xbuntu distro thinking its light weight and ubuntu tested
>>>> >by lots of devs and users...heh. Zevenos would only install via the "create
>>>> >big folder" on windows. But would it boot?
>>>> >Uh uh...it gave a nice error 15. But I *will* say this for it. The included
>>>> >uninstaller worked *perfectly*.
>>>> >
>>>> >^_^
>>>> >
>>>> >Hmmmmm...I guess the Dell D600 Lattitude is a very hard laptop to support
>>>> with
>>>> >the linuxes.
>>>> >
>>>> >Bummer.
>>>>
>>>> Pioneer Linux
>>>
>>>Heh...d00d! I just FUBAR'd my xp install with puppy linux!
>>>Following the instructions here:
>>>http://www.puppylinux.org/manuals/pu...py/frugal-inst
>>>allation
>>>
>>>And trying some different combinations to resolve it and I'm left with a lovely
>>>Grub Error 17...still.
>>>
>>>LULZ! Linux...
>>
>> Noob
>
>I'm back with Mepis 7.
>But X is slow. Heres my xorg.conf file...the card is a ATI Mobility Radeon
>9000 R250...but it looks like its using some generic vesa thingy :(


Section "Device"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "radeon"
BoardName "unknown"

It's using the Radeon driver so it's not using a "generic vesa thingy"
Maybe the Radeon drive has to be more specific as in Radeon Mobility
as xorg doesn't know the specific "board" so as far as it is concerned
it could be any Radeon board which isn't correct and will affect
graphics and display acceleration.

If it's slow you have no GL or GLX. Look here for clues, Noob.

http://wiki.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature

And go to xorg's website and snoop around for the Mobility specific
driver. Load up Belarc and figure out which exact chipset it is and
the PCI bus location.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:29:43 +0000 (UTC), Davorin Vlahovic
<nrubA@ylf.krs.ref.rh>wrote:

>[Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:43:35 -0400] Meat Plow je napisao/la:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:29:54 +0000 (UTC), Davorin Vlahovic
>><nrubA@ylf.krs.ref.rh>wrote:
>>
>>>[Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:18:10 -0600] ???hw??f je napisao/la:
>>>>> Have a nice day.
>>>>>
>>>> Suck my nuts, bitch.
>>>>
>>>> ^_^
>>>
>>>Sorry, I'm not gay. Better luck somewhere else.
>>
>> Do you have to be gay to suck nuts?
>
>Don't know. But you'd have to be to ask another guy to do it to you :)

I don't really like to suck nuts, seems a waste of time. I prefer mine
salted and roasted in the shell.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:19:59 -0500, thunder pinched out a steaming pile
of:

> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:51:43 +0000, §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>
>
>> I'm using Mepis 7.0 beta2...it was either that or Open SuSE 10.2 My
>> ****ty dsl provider will kick me off during big downloads. I'm totally
>> disadvanteged.
>> :(
>
> Just curious, are you using wget for downloads? If you use the -c
> option, it will restart the download where it stopped. It might take you
> several times, but you should be able to get the complete download.

No, just firefox and the ftp repository.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:50:16 +0000, Davorin Vlahovic pinched out a
steaming pile of:

> [Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:10:39 +0000 (UTC)] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:45:17 +0000, Davorin Vlahovic pinched out a
>> steaming pile of:
>>
>>> [Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:25:52 -0600] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
>>>>> They aren't supposed to. They aren't supposed to install/upgrade the engine
>>>>> in a car, they aren't supposed to maintain the electrical systems, etc.,
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> They go to the repair shop for those things. Computers should be the same.
>>>>> Someone who doesn't understand (and/or doesnt't want to understand) what a
>>>>> process is, what ACLs are, what config files are and how they are structured
>>>>> he/she shouldn't be messing with those things, just like they shouldn't be
>>>>> messing with the breaking fluid.
>>>>
>>>> The "BREAKING FLUID"???
>>>> BUAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>> I bet yer qualified to work on EBS systems too huh?
>>>
>>> Are you having problems comprehending simple sentences? If so that would
>>> explain some things.
>>>
>> Yuor spall che><0r is t3h b0rk3n :)
>
> Don't use one. One wouldn't fix this mistake anyway.
>
>>>> Sure, you do ****nuckle. Ive been playing with linux since RH 8 came out.
>>>
>>> Doesn't matter. I know people who have been playing with computers since Win
>>> 3.1 and still don't comprehend what happens when you leave the bootable dvd
>>> in the drive while computer is turned on and why their windows don't come up
>>> as they should.
>>>
>> Its the magic gnomes in the heat sink.
>> DONT LISSEN TO THEM!
>> THEY LIE!!!!!11111!!!!!
>
> "LISSEN"? Perhaps you should turn the spellchecker on. This is a mistake it
> most definitely would correct.
>
You make an excellent "straight" man.
Have you got vaudeville experience?

>>> You have to learn how to use the system, not play with it. If you really
>>> looked at how the basics work (ie. file system layouts/partitions) you
>>> wouldn't have written that it's too much of a hassle to get dual boot
>>> xp+linux. It's been done automatically for at least more than half a decade,
>>> manually even longer, even with Windows 3.11/95/98.
>>>
>>
>> Thats amazing. Too bad you dont live next door. I'd be totally over at
>> your place all the time asking you stuff :)
>
> You probably couldn't afford my consultancy rates :)
>
I could give you a back rub...with "full release".

>>> While we're slapping around, I've been working with slackware in circa
>>> 1995. which had kernel version 1.0.9. My first Windows were 3.0, my
>>> first unix was Microsoft Xenix (Microsoft was at one time the biggest
>>> unix distributer for personal computers).
>>>
>> But did you hang out with Larry Ellison?
>> Hmmmm...
>
> Wrong continent.
>
Next you'll be channeling Tim Bernerss Lee...

>>>> It's improved in some areas but its still not on-par with windows for
>>>> support for hardware (blame the manufactureres, right) or on ease of
>>>> set up.
>>>
>>> Bull****. Linux has more drivers out of the box than any version of
>>> Windows ever.
>>
>> Fer reals? Even more than W-7?
>> 0_o
>
> I know you're joking, but anyway... yes, about an order of magnitude more
> drivers.
>
Impossible. W-7 is backwards compatibel with drivers for XP.
^_^

>>> It's just that _new_ _closed_ hardware has problems
>>> cooperating. Just look at how malformed ACPI system is on most laptops.
>>> It's horrible. Some of them are even set up to give false information to
>>> everything that isn't Windows.
>>>
>> I balme Bill Gates.
>
> "balme"? How's that spell checker coming along?
>
> And, actually, yes, it's his fault.
>
> http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowa...00/PX03020.pdf
>
So its okey if I steel his warez?


>>> Don't believe me? Try booting Windows on a SPARC or POWER6 server.
>>>
>> Sun Systems is for teh |-|4><0r2, d00d.
>
> To someone who barely knows what a power button is, someone who knows how to
> start cmd and type "dir" is a hacker. You can be a hacker even if you don't
> own any equipment. Just ask Steve Wozniak.
>
He wont return my calls.
:(

> Not that it matters since you've completely missed the point of my argument.
>
Something about weasels, IIRC.

>>> Ease of set up? Bull****, you even have to click less to install Ubuntu
>>> than Windows Vista. And Windows usually clobber MBR even without asking.
>>>
>> Well thats windows being all presumptive, as usual.
>>
>>> http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benc...a-vs-windows-7
>>>
>> Hmmm...the Richards test was comprable.
>
> "comprable"?
>
Ya. Purty much.
^_^

>>> On top of that, Ubuntu gets you far more software per inital
>>> installation and takes less disk space to boot.
>>>
>> Its got a small footprint,thats for sure.
>
> No, it is... wait for it... modular.
>
BUT IS IT SCALEABLE!?!?


>>>> I can do a winbox in half an hour whereas a linux install requires
>>>> several additional tweaks for the network, hardware, etc.
>>>
>>> Sir, you are a liar.
>>
>> Come here and say that :)
>
> I am here. You are a liar.
>
Swing and a miss!
Try again.

>>>Not to mention that Windows requires all sorts of
>>> tweaks to have even remotely usable system... ie. installing myriad of
>>> drivers, functioning web browser, etc, etc. W7 is sort of better that
>>> other Windows at the moment, but not even close to Ubuntu.
>>>
>> Slipstreamed windows doing an unnatended install is harder than Ubuntu?
>> Wowzers!
>
> Bwahahahaha :)
>
> Of course, you do understand somebody has to set those options before the
> installation? Not that Linux has the same capability. To raise your bet, I
> offer you unattended (double t, not double n) installation while booting the
> system over network :) While we're at it, I don't even have to install linux,
> I can mount root and home file systems over network file system :)
>

ZOMGZ! Yuor teh l337!
TEECH MEE AL U NO!

>>>> Now go stand in the corner.
>>>
>>> I know you are either a troll or a very incompetent person (actually,
>>> being incompetent is the average today so don't feel bad) so you should
>>> probably listen to your own advice.
>>>
>> I'd rather sit here and laugh at you.
>
> Yeah. You probably copy-pasted that sentence. No mistakes in it :)

Nope, the mexican voice in my head spells better than the german won.

<nods>

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:36:38 +0000, Kadaitcha Man pinched out a steaming
pile of:

> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:49:35 +0000, jellybean stonerfish wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:10:39 +0000, §ñühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>>> I balme Bill Gates.
>>
>> Yuor spall che><0r is t3h b0rk3n :)
>
> No, no, no! Wolfie will balme anyone if they pay him enough.
>
Ceptin fer you. Gratis.

^_^

[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:28:54 -0000] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
>> "LISSEN"? Perhaps you should turn the spellchecker on. This is a mistake it
>> most definitely would correct.
>>
> You make an excellent "straight" man.
> Have you got vaudeville experience?

Incoherent.


>> You probably couldn't afford my consultancy rates :)
>>
> I could give you a back rub...with "full release".

Vulgar.


>> Wrong continent.
>>
> Next you'll be channeling Tim Bernerss Lee...

Can't keep up in a conversation.


>> I know you're joking, but anyway... yes, about an order of magnitude more
>> drivers.
>>
> Impossible. W-7 is backwards compatibel with drivers for XP.

Misguided on multiple levels.


>>> I balme Bill Gates.
>>
>> "balme"? How's that spell checker coming along?
>>
>> And, actually, yes, it's his fault.
>>
>> http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowa...00/PX03020.pdf
>>
> So its okey if I steel his warez?

Proposes crime.


>>>> Don't believe me? Try booting Windows on a SPARC or POWER6 server.
>>>>
>>> Sun Systems is for teh |-|4><0r2, d00d.
>>
>> To someone who barely knows what a power button is, someone who knows how to
>> start cmd and type "dir" is a hacker. You can be a hacker even if you don't
>> own any equipment. Just ask Steve Wozniak.
>>
> He wont return my calls.
>:(

Childish.


>> Not that it matters since you've completely missed the point of my argument.
>>
> Something about weasels, IIRC.

Short attention span.


>>>> Ease of set up? Bull****, you even have to click less to install Ubuntu
>>>> than Windows Vista. And Windows usually clobber MBR even without asking.
>>>>
>>> Well thats windows being all presumptive, as usual.
>>>
>>>> http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benc...a-vs-windows-7
>>>>
>>> Hmmm...the Richards test was comprable.
>>
>> "comprable"?
>>
> Ya. Purty much.

Illiterate.


>>>> On top of that, Ubuntu gets you far more software per inital
>>>> installation and takes less disk space to boot.
>>>>
>>> Its got a small footprint,thats for sure.
>>
>> No, it is... wait for it... modular.
>>
> BUT IS IT SCALEABLE!?!?
>

Doesn't know boundaries nor weight of an argument, can't debate in a normal
way.


>>>>> I can do a winbox in half an hour whereas a linux install requires
>>>>> several additional tweaks for the network, hardware, etc.
>>>> Sir, you are a liar.
>>>
>>> Come here and say that :)
>>
>> I am here. You are a liar.
>>
> Swing and a miss!
> Try again.

Doesn't understand logic.


>>> Slipstreamed windows doing an unnatended install is harder than Ubuntu?
>>
>> Of course, you do understand somebody has to set those options before the
>> installation? Not that Linux has the same capability. To raise your bet, I
>> offer you unattended (double t, not double n) installation while booting the
>> system over network :) While we're at it, I don't even have to install linux,
>> I can mount root and home file systems over network file system :)
>
> ZOMGZ! Yuor teh l337!
> TEECH MEE AL U NO!

Tries to demean co-debitant after exausting his shallow pool of arguments.


>>>>> Now go stand in the corner.
>>>>
>>>> I know you are either a troll or a very incompetent person (actually,
>>>> being incompetent is the average today so don't feel bad) so you should
>>>> probably listen to your own advice.
>>>>
>>> I'd rather sit here and laugh at you.
>>
>> Yeah. You probably copy-pasted that sentence. No mistakes in it :)
>
> Nope, the mexican voice in my head spells better than the german won.

Shizophrenic.


You certainly make your parents proud, don't you?
--
You, you, and you: Panic. The rest of you, come with me.

In message <gma6d51h8sppk7sp9lkt247ha2hbs26t42@4ax.com>,
Pennywise@DerryMaine.Gov wrote:
> §ñühw¤£f <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> ># Settings for wacom cursor (mouse)
>
> You have a wacom? I'd run windows just to use Photoshop.
>
No, but thats an example of the default linux xorg.conf file: include every
input device and then fail to REM it out after youve installed the system.
Kewl huh?

^_^

--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/

In message <slrnhd6oko.dpr.nrubA@zeus.home.lan>, Davorin Vlahovic wrote:
> [Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:28:54 -0000] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
> >> "LISSEN"? Perhaps you should turn the spellchecker on. This is a mistake
> it
> >> most definitely would correct.
> >>
> > You make an excellent "straight" man.
> > Have you got vaudeville experience?
>
> Incoherent.
>
I told you not to drink before poasting, sheesh!

> >> You probably couldn't afford my consultancy rates :)
> >>
> > I could give you a back rub...with "full release".
>
> Vulgar.
>
Wanna see nekid jpigs of me?

>
> >> Wrong continent.
> >>
> > Next you'll be channeling Tim Bernerss Lee...
>
> Can't keep up in a conversation.
>
MAybe if you stopped drinking?
:(
>
> >> I know you're joking, but anyway... yes, about an order of magnitude more
> >> drivers.
> >>
> > Impossible. W-7 is backwards compatibel with drivers for XP.
>
> Misguided on multiple levels.
>
Now whos fault is that?

>
> >>> I balme Bill Gates.
> >>
> >> "balme"? How's that spell checker coming along?
> >>
> >> And, actually, yes, it's his fault.
> >>
> >>
> http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowa...00/PX03020.pdf
> >>
> > So its okey if I steel his warez?
>
> Proposes crime.
>
Dolphins fraud.

>
> >>>> Don't believe me? Try booting Windows on a SPARC or POWER6 server.
> >>>>
> >>> Sun Systems is for teh |-|4><0r2, d00d.
> >>
> >> To someone who barely knows what a power button is, someone who knows
> how to
> >> start cmd and type "dir" is a hacker. You can be a hacker even if you
> don't
> >> own any equipment. Just ask Steve Wozniak.
> >>
> > He wont return my calls.
> >:(
>
> Childish.
>
I know! You'd think he'd have the decency to send a note.

>
> >> Not that it matters since you've completely missed the point of my
> argument.
> >>
> > Something about weasels, IIRC.
>
> Short attention span.
>
Your brain damage is noted.

>
> >>>> Ease of set up? Bull****, you even have to click less to install Ubuntu
> >>>> than Windows Vista. And Windows usually clobber MBR even without
> asking.
> >>>>
> >>> Well thats windows being all presumptive, as usual.
> >>>
> >>>>
> http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benc...a-vs-windows-7
> >>>>
> >>> Hmmm...the Richards test was comprable.
> >>
> >> "comprable"?
> >>
> > Ya. Purty much.
>
> Illiterate.
>
Reading is FUN-damental, sure.

>
> >>>> On top of that, Ubuntu gets you far more software per inital
> >>>> installation and takes less disk space to boot.
> >>>>
> >>> Its got a small footprint,thats for sure.
> >>
> >> No, it is... wait for it... modular.
> >>
> > BUT IS IT SCALEABLE!?!?
> >
>
> Doesn't know boundaries nor weight of an argument, can't debate in a normal
> way.
>
My condolences.

>
> >>>>> I can do a winbox in half an hour whereas a linux install requires
> >>>>> several additional tweaks for the network, hardware, etc.
> >>>> Sir, you are a liar.
> >>>
> >>> Come here and say that :)
> >>
> >> I am here. You are a liar.
> >>
> > Swing and a miss!
> > Try again.
>
> Doesn't understand logic.
>
Must you parade your shortcomings?

>
> >>> Slipstreamed windows doing an unnatended install is harder than Ubuntu?
> >>
> >> Of course, you do understand somebody has to set those options before the
> >> installation? Not that Linux has the same capability. To raise your bet,
> I
> >> offer you unattended (double t, not double n) installation while booting
> the
> >> system over network :) While we're at it, I don't even have to install
> linux,
> >> I can mount root and home file systems over network file system :)
> >
> > ZOMGZ! Yuor teh l337!
> > TEECH MEE AL U NO!
>
> Tries to demean co-debitant after exausting his shallow pool of arguments.
>
Well your tactic didnt work now did it?

>
> >>>>> Now go stand in the corner.
> >>>>
> >>>> I know you are either a troll or a very incompetent person (actually,
> >>>> being incompetent is the average today so don't feel bad) so you should
> >>>> probably listen to your own advice.
> >>>>
> >>> I'd rather sit here and laugh at you.
> >>
> >> Yeah. You probably copy-pasted that sentence. No mistakes in it :)
> >
> > Nope, the mexican voice in my head spells better than the german won.
>
> Shizophrenic.
>
Not according to the norweeegian von :)
>
> You certainly make your parents proud, don't you?

Sorry, dad :(

--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/

In message <slrnhd4s29.4dg.nrubA@zeus.home.lan>, Davorin Vlahovic wrote:
> [Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:51:43 +0000 (UTC)] §ñühw¤£f je
> napisao/la:
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:48:08 +0000, Davorin Vlahovic pinched out a
> > steaming pile of:
> >
> >> [Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:17:04 -0600] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
> >>>> That sounds like a good plan to me. Are you planning on dual booting
> >>>> the LT or just linux?
> >>>>
> >>> AT this point, dual booting with XP is too much of a hassle.
> >>> Just going to be a linbox for now.
> >>
> >> Yes, sure, children aged 11 get it right so it must be really hard :)
> >>
> > Your interest in eleven year old children is noted :(
>
> Get yourself checked. Quickly. Before it spreads.
>
My trolling s|<1LL2 are non-transferable.
HTH

> >>>> installed opensuse 11.1 ... just comment out the virtual options in the
> >>>> screen section of xorg and it works a treat. This was after I had tried
> >>>> EVERYTHING I possibly could to get the thing to co-operate.
> >>>>
> >>> The driver for the ATI card is not just big but runs two executables
> under
> >>> windows, getting it "just right" in linux will take some patience.
> >>> There should be a pill for that ;)
> >>
> >> For buying mostly incompatible hardware? Sure. Try running Windows on SGI
> >> MIPS machines and report your results.
> >>
> > No. You aint teh boss of me.
>
> Oh, I get it. You don't have enough brain resources to understand what I
> have
> said.
>
Or I'm not interested enough to g00gle the wiki entry, your pick.
Like, whatever & junk.

> >>>> I've installed and stably run PCLinuxOS 2007 (2.6.x) on a Latitude D600
> >>>> since December 2007. Installed an ran "out of the box" on hardware
> >>>> configured as in the article.
> >>>> </snip>
> >>>>
> >>> Neato. I think I'll stick with Mepis 7.0 beta2 until I can find a way
> to get
> >>> another full-size distro downloaded successfuly.
> >>
> >> Perhaps you could try Mint.
> >
> > I'm using Mepis 7.0 beta2...
>
> beta?
>
theta?

> > it was either that or Open SuSE 10.2
>
> 10.2? How old is that? Three years?
>
You grep it, slave boi.

> > My ****ty dsl provider will kick me off during big downloads.
> > I'm totally disadvanteged.
> >:(
>
> wget -c <url>
>
> It will continue the download if the connection gets cut.

W00t.

--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/

[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:52:47 -0600] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
> In message <slrnhd6oko.dpr.nrubA@zeus.home.lan>, Davorin Vlahovic wrote:
>> Incoherent.
>>
> I told you not to drink before poasting, sheesh!
>
>> Vulgar.
>>
> Wanna see nekid jpigs of me?
>
>> Can't keep up in a conversation.
>>
> MAybe if you stopped drinking?
>:(
>>
>> Misguided on multiple levels.
>>
> Now whos fault is that?
>
>> Proposes crime.
>>
> Dolphins fraud.
>
>>
>> Childish.
>>
> I know! You'd think he'd have the decency to send a note.
>
>> Short attention span.
>>
> Your brain damage is noted.
>
>> Illiterate.
>>
> Reading is FUN-damental, sure.
>
>> Doesn't know boundaries nor weight of an argument, can't debate in a normal
>> way.
>>
> My condolences.
>
>> Doesn't understand logic.
>>
> Must you parade your shortcomings?
>
>> Tries to demean co-debitant after exausting his shallow pool of arguments.
>>
> Well your tactic didnt work now did it?
>
>> Shizophrenic.
>>
> Not according to the norweeegian von :)
>>
>> You certainly make your parents proud, don't you?
>
> Sorry, dad :(


Just like a child. Too bad.
--
You, you, and you: Panic. The rest of you, come with me.

[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:56:05 -0600] §ñühw¤£f je napisao/la:
>> Oh, I get it. You don't have enough brain resources to understand what I
>> have
>> said.
>>
> Or I'm not interested enough to g00gle the wiki entry, your pick.
> Like, whatever & junk.
>

So, you demand of others to do your reading? Yeah, why don't we put a
banner here saying "We read man pages, info and search the web instead
of you for free."?

I guess your nickname here has expired. Time to think of new one if you want
people to help you after this stupidity.

--
You, you, and you: Panic. The rest of you, come with me.