| |||
| Linux Log Filesystem? What's the status on it? Are there any production ready Log File Systems out there for linux yet? The most promising looks to be the NILFS, but it looks to be still in the preproduction stage. I am looking for a reliable system for production server. Have any of you tried NILFS or implemented it in a file server, and what were the results? Thank you for the help, - Bogdan |
| |||
| Re: Linux Log Filesystem? What's the status on it? On 2007-08-08, x0054 <x0054@index.com> wrote: > Are there any production ready Log File Systems out there for linux yet? > The most promising looks to be the NILFS, but it looks to be still in the > preproduction stage. I am looking for a reliable system for production > server. Have any of you tried NILFS or implemented it in a file server, and > what were the results? Hi. Can't help you, sorry. But what i a Log File System? On that retains version of files, or perhaps one the logs the modificaions to files, so you can 'rewind' and re-apply. Banks seem to do that, I've heard. -- There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. Douglas Adams |
| |||
| Re: Linux Log Filesystem? What's the status on it? Rikishi 42 <fsck_spam@telenet.be> wrote in news:ugupo4-bqe.ln1@whisper.very.softly: > On 2007-08-08, x0054 <x0054@index.com> wrote: > >> Are there any production ready Log File Systems out there for linux >> yet? The most promising looks to be the NILFS, but it looks to be >> still in the preproduction stage. I am looking for a reliable system >> for production server. Have any of you tried NILFS or implemented it >> in a file server, and what were the results? > > Hi. Can't help you, sorry. > > But what i a Log File System? On that retains version of files, or > perhaps one the logs the modificaions to files, so you can 'rewind' > and re-apply. Banks seem to do that, I've heard. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log_File_System I am setting up a file server and I was shooting for both, redundancy with raid1 and archiving with LFS. Yes, LFS let's you look incrementally at all the changes to a given file, thus if someone ****s up and changes something in a file and then saves it, using LFS you can get the prior copy of the file back. And it's more efficient the other archiving solutions because it only saves incremental changes, thus if you have 100mb file that has been changed slightly 10 times, you can have access to all 10 prior copies of that file without wasting 1gb of space on it. - Bogdan |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Linux Training Tips - Boot Linux from a Linux Installation CD or a Linux Live CD to Learn Linux | knowledgefield@hotmail.com | Linux | 0 | 06-17-2007 03:00 AM |
| WPD filesystem error | netfreak | Vista Hardware | 0 | 04-12-2007 02:57 PM |
| WPD filesystem error | netfreak | Vista Hardware | 0 | 04-12-2007 02:49 PM |
| Need a free 'Status Monitor' or 'Dashboard' to report overnight tasks status | Shug | Windows XP | 0 | 01-04-2007 05:52 AM |