|
| | |||||||
| Internet Explorer Discuss IE7 or any other IE version. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| automatically begin IE with InPRIVATE Sometimes I dream of my using Internet Explorer 8.0 only in InPRIVATE mode. Today's typical sedentary lifestyle is plagues by much stress and anxiety, now browsing the Internet should be somewhat of a stress-killer, then why should I be anxious about my Safety while transacting money, while accessing my email accounts, social accounts, and other such Internet tasks getting exposed to an Outsider? Someitmes, I wish I'd always like it start IE 'InPrivate'. Even Google Chrome's feedback page already has an option to Suggest automatically starting in Incognito Mode, Chrome's equivalent of IE8.0's InPrivate, which means that a lot many users have been recommending it. We already have an option wherein we can Begin IE8.0 without Addons, Please - I'd like to begin IE 8.1 directly in InPrivate MODE. Please let not this be only a dream. Watch out for more great feature requests from me! An IE Fan. Forever. IE. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/communities...plorer.general |
| |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Re: automatically begin IE with InPRIVATE Ryan wrote: > Sometimes I dream of my using Internet Explorer 8.0 only in InPRIVATE > mode. Today's typical sedentary lifestyle is plagues by much stress and > anxiety, now browsing the Internet should be somewhat of a stress-killer, > then why should I be anxious about my Safety while transacting money, > while accessing my email accounts, social accounts, and other such > Internet tasks getting exposed to an Outsider? Someitmes, I wish I'd > always like it start IE 'InPrivate'. > > Even Google Chrome's feedback page already has an option to Suggest > automatically starting in Incognito Mode, Chrome's equivalent of IE8.0's > InPrivate, which means that a lot many users have been recommending it. > > We already have an option wherein we can Begin IE8.0 without Addons, > Please - I'd like to begin IE 8.1 directly in InPrivate MODE. Please let > not this be only a dream. > > Watch out for more great feature requests from me! > An IE Fan. Forever. IE. > > ---------------- > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow > this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader > and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. > > http://www.microsoft.com/communities...plorer.general See: http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/ho...de-by-default/ -- Vincenzo Di Russo Microsoft® MVP - Most Valuable Professional since 2003 Windows Internet Explorer, Windows Desktop Experience & Security My MVP Profile: https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Vincenzo My Blog: http://blogs.dotnethell.it/vincent/ |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: automatically begin IE with InPRIVATE Ryan wrote: > Sometimes I dream of my using Internet Explorer 8.0 only in InPRIVATE mode. <snip> The InPrivate Filter in IE8 can be used for blocking ads, porn, malevolent, intellitext, and other unwanted content in web pages. Alas, Microsoft defaults this option to Off when IE8 is started and provides extremely poor documentation on it both in regards to how the site count threshold affects what sites are recorded (and how they remain recorded at a higher threshold to remain usable at a lower threshold but not visa versa) and also in how to compose an .xml file that can be used via RSS subscription or import into IE8 to add more blocking on specific URL strings. At http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...20(VS.85).aspx, it states "Characters in the URL that have special meaning to the regular expression, such as dots ('.') and path separators ('/'), must be escaped with a backslash ('\')." However, Microsoft's own example is inconsistent with their own regex requirement. The dot (".") regex character matches on ANY character in that position, not just the period character. In Microsoft's own example of "ads.contoso.com\/.*" (where they meant to match on the "ads.contoso.com" host with a trailing slash character but the ".*" to match on zero, or more, characters was superfluous), they omitted to escape the period characters. That means "adsXcontosoXcom/" would also match. It should've been "ads\.contoso\.com\/.*" in their example (actually just "ads\.contoso\.\/" would suffice). They managed to remember to escape the slash character but forgot to escape the period characters (but did remember that ".*" is used in regex where * repeats zero, or more, times the prior character which is the dot to represent any character versus the old "*" DOS wildcard character). Regular expressions (regex) from the UNIX realm is just as foreign to Microsoft as it is to their users. An example of .xml file that can be imported into IE8's InPrivate Filter to add blocking on URL substrings can be found at http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r221...lock-plus-list. This list was composed by usurping the block list from AdBlock Plus and converting it to an .xml file. However, that author doesn't understand regex. He understands the old DOS wildcarding syntax. As such, he never escapes the period character which means ANY character will match at that position in the string. In many cases, the author forgot to escape the slash character, too. That his may work doesn't mean the syntax was valid or that he is actually targeting only the URL that he intended with his patterns. Of course, no one wants to use a filter that they always have to turn on before it becomes effective. They want it always on. The InPrivate Filter in IE8 defaults to Off when it is started. To default to On for this filter, read the following: Always enable InPrivate Filtering: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2346892,00.asp (item 6) http://blogs.msdn.com/dmart/archive/...y-default.aspx Microsoft added a potentially valuable filter function to IE8 but, as typical for them, they screwed it up with defaulting it to Off (or not remembering the user's choice) when IE8 starts and with extremely poor documentation (and not even being consistent in their own examples which results in using improper regex syntax). It has promise but not until Microsoft chooses to actually support it. As with Microsoft Security Essentials (a replacement for Windows Defender that only had spyware detection but MSE adds an anti-virus component) that can be simply disabled with just a "net stop" command or with their Windows Firewall (a basic firewall with no HIPS features), Microsoft again comes up short with IE8's InPrivate Filter. "Missed by just t-h-a-t much" (Maxwell Smart, "Get Smart" TV series). > ---------------- > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, ... Always ask before suggestion. You might find out what you want is already available. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: InPrivate as default | PA Bear [MS MVP] | Internet Explorer | 1 | 10-26-2009 06:20 PM |
| InPrivate Browsing | moon | Windows XP | 5 | 10-06-2009 01:30 AM |
| InPrivate Filtering and Browsing | mpw | Internet Explorer | 6 | 09-13-2009 07:00 PM |
| InPrivate filtering in IE8 | Smirnoff | Internet Explorer | 1 | 04-02-2009 12:11 AM |
| Where the F**K do I begin? | GregForester@ruralnet.com | Linux | 54 | 09-05-2007 02:10 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |