Technology Questions

Go Back   Technology Questions > Manufacturer Questions > Manufacturers > Apple > Apple Macintosh Hardware

Apple Macintosh Hardware Discuss the Apple Macintosh Hardware

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 05:30 PM
Lady Chatterly
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: dual 500-gigabit- vs celeron 1000

In article <BE0896BA.1B059¾hni@comcast.net>
Brian Paul Ehni <behni@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I don't think I've ever seen such a chart. However, a dual 500 actually runs
>about like a 750, in my experience. Apple processors have always been able
>to do CERTAIN things (like some Photoshop actions) a little faster than
>Windows machines. I vividly recall past Apple Keynote presentations where a
>(for example) 400 MHz PowerMac would blow away the best Pentium money could
>buy at the same point in time. In toto, the Mac would win handily, proving
>its superiority. Again, these were carefully chosen actions which the Mac
>ran better in Photoshop. I've also seen reviews in PC mags stating the exact
>opposite.


And you know the limitations of Mr.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Lady Chatterly is a bot, making its way all throughout usenet. It's
amusing to see some of the reactions it gets in the Google archives."
-- Asiya

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

 
Old 02-06-2007, 05:30 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2007, 05:30 PM
Brian Paul Ehni
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: dual 500-gigabit- vs celeron 1000

On 1/25/05 9:24 AM, in article 59787a9.381fcf87@comcast.com, "Lady
Chatterly" <behni@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote:

> In article <BE0896BA.1B059¾hni@comcast.net>
> Brian Paul Ehni <behni@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think I've ever seen such a chart. However, a dual 500 actually runs
>> about like a 750, in my experience. Apple processors have always been able
>> to do CERTAIN things (like some Photoshop actions) a little faster than
>> Windows machines. I vividly recall past Apple Keynote presentations where a
>> (for example) 400 MHz PowerMac would blow away the best Pentium money could
>> buy at the same point in time. In toto, the Mac would win handily, proving
>> its superiority. Again, these were carefully chosen actions which the Mac
>> ran better in Photoshop. I've also seen reviews in PC mags stating the exact
>> opposite.

>
> And you know the limitations of Mr.
>
> --
> Lady Chatterly
>
> "Lady Chatterly is a bot, making its way all throughout usenet. It's
> amusing to see some of the reactions it gets in the Google archives."
> -- Asiya
>


This page gives Apple's latest claims: http://www.apple.com/powermac/
--
Brian Ehni


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beep(1000,1000) doesn't work - Vista Service Antonin Hofmann Windows Vista 0 04-30-2008 02:10 AM
Intel Pro/1000 gigabit adapter tmsea Windows Vista 4 01-31-2008 09:10 PM
Another Intel dual-core Celeron in 2Q08 LPH UMPC Buzz Bloggers 0 01-21-2008 04:00 PM
Another Intel dual-core Celeron in 2Q08 LPH Intel 0 01-21-2008 09:01 AM
dual 500-gigabit- vs celeron 1000 cz Apple Macintosh Hardware 5 02-06-2007 05:29 PM


New To Technology Questions? Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? Do You Need Help with this site?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.


2003 - 2009 All Rights Reserved. Technology Questions

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0