On 2008-04-10, Hadron <hadronquark@googlemail.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> "Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> writes:
>[color=green]
>> "Moshe Goldfarb" <brick.n.straw******.com> wrote in message
>> news:1d90ogevhssac.1unp33rqyvymt$.dlg@40tude.net...[color=darkred]
>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:17:25 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's Cooking in PulseAudio's glitch-free Branch
>>>
>>> Another day.
>>>
>>> Another Linux sound system.
>>>
>>> Talk about total confusion.
>>>
>>> How many different sound systems are we up to now?
>>> Like ten?[/color]
>>
>> Linux operates on the survival of the fittest. Unlike Windows products,
>> they compete and it isn't a monopoly.[/color]
>
> You could not be more wrong. Because there is no commercial need for
> most Linux stuff, even the crap stay there. I hate to tell you but most
> SW used on Windows is not from MS. It is from competing commercial
> companies.
>
> I mean, really, could you be more clueless?
>[color=green]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> You Linux guys can't even get ALSA working properly, and easily, yet you
>>> keep churning out one sound system after another.[/color]
>>
>> Further ahead than Vista.[/color]
>
> Are you joking? Linux sound architecture is a joke at the moment.
>
> Here's the Pulseaudio "how to make it work" wiki:
>
> [url]http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup[/url]
>
> And thats the easy bit. There are many distro specific hacks and the
> need to compile from CVS in many cases.[/color]

I did absolutely nothing with my sound setup, in either Hardy or
Gutsy, it all just worked. My use of sound is mostly watching movies
or listening to music.

i