"J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:659udjF2f9tckU1@mid.individual.net...
> sk8r-365 wrote:
> > Thus spake Mike:
> >> Responding to Luigi Dal Monte...
> >>> What do you think?
> >>> http://kianuel.myminicity.com
> >>>
> >> Tried looking using Dillo, just got "This site needs javascript".
> >>
> >> Therefore, site broken.
> >
> > <chuckling>
> >
> >> Not a good start.
> >
> > I just hate a "requirement" for a site to "be accessible" based on
> > something as unneeded as Java and any other "whiz bang!" effects.
> > Whatever happened to consideration of text-only or simple (X)HTML
> > optioned Web sites? What I mean is what happened to Web sites which
> > were written to offer a choice?
>
> I remember when I begun to surf around on the net, then it was quite plane
> sites, just text and some images when needed. No need to register on sites
to
> get access to everything they had, no rich organizations hunting poor
people
> who shared files. It was the time of the free internet, not spam free but
not
> more in a year than you get in a day today. Suddenly something bad happen,
> someone invented frames...

<>

the good old days

http://www.archive.org/web/web.php