sk8r-365 wrote:
> Thus spake Mike:
>> Responding to Luigi Dal Monte...
>>> What do you think?
>>> http://kianuel.myminicity.com
>>>
>> Tried looking using Dillo, just got "This site needs javascript".
>>
>> Therefore, site broken.
>
> <chuckling>
>
>> Not a good start.
>
> I just hate a "requirement" for a site to "be accessible" based on
> something as unneeded as Java and any other "whiz bang!" effects.
> Whatever happened to consideration of text-only or simple (X)HTML
> optioned Web sites? What I mean is what happened to Web sites which
> were written to offer a choice?

I remember when I begun to surf around on the net, then it was quite plane
sites, just text and some images when needed. No need to register on sites to
get access to everything they had, no rich organizations hunting poor people
who shared files. It was the time of the free internet, not spam free but not
more in a year than you get in a day today. Suddenly something bad happen,
someone invented frames...


--

//Aho