PD43 wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2:43 pm, BoB <m...@box.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Since I am experiencing no problems, it was not time well spent for me.
>
> Which begs the question: since you were not experiencing problems WHY
> did you run it?
>
> Your choice to run it was to blame for your time not being well spent.
So are you saying that sfc can do damage?
I'm asking innocently. I've been reading the F1 help on sfc and as
usual, Microsoft makes it a bit unclear as to why to run this. Is see
it "fixes" dll's. But again, is there harm in running it without
errors. Would there be a "display only" mode?

I'm still browsing other links in this thread, so they may add fuel to
the fire.