modern as in linux that is 20 years old? lol


"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:63l3dqF26tf91U5@mid.individual.net...[color=blue]
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:56:15 +0200, On the Bridge! wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Dedicated to the idiot, racist, nazi-like ALEXB who insists that the
>> vista defrag is the best thing
>> since sliced bread and irreplaceable.. what an idiot...
>>
>> [url]http://www.cnet.com/8301-13880_1-9887297-68.html?[/url][/color]
> part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20[color=green]
>>
>> it just so happens that they are recommending the same defrag free
>> program, and for the SAME reason as I did.... great minds think
>> alike... and alexB thinks like an idiot... (third time I called him that
>> in one post... oh boy he deserves it!)
>>
>> "Windows' own Disk Defragmenter is a slug compared to Auslogics'
>> alternative. At least in XP, you got some feedback while the Windows
>> defragger was working; Vista doesn't give you a clue what's happening
>> after you click the Defragment Now button, other than to let you know
>> that the process could take from a few minutes to a few hours (my bet's
>> on the latter). I know many people scoff at the dancing colored blocks
>> on the map as pointless, but I kinda like 'em. "[/color]
>
> Or one could move to a modern filesystem which does not need
> defragmenting and obviate the entire process.[/color]