rude...

but will ignore you
on the photos newsgroup
for all your future inquiries
as well.

--

db ·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·..><)))º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><)))º>¸.
><)))º>·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·.. ><)))º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><)))º>


..


"H.S." <hs.samREMOVEMEix@google.com> wrote in message
news:%231ADK$DcIHA.5400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> db ´¯`·.. ><)))º>` .. . wrote:
>> actually, it is a basic
>> toy and not a super toy
>> but the quality of the pic
>> also plays a factor.
>
> You don't make any sense here at all. Either the utility works on JPEG images
> losslessly or it doesn't. The quality of the picture has nothing to do with
> it.
>
>
>
>> if there is some losslessly,
>> then you might try a
>> graphics program that
>> can modify the pics and
>> provide gainfullness.
>> here is a listing:
>>
>> http://www.cameratown.com/software/
>
>
> Thanks, but this is quite irrelevant here.
>
>
>>
>> you can also get more
>> help on photos by posting
>> your questions here:
>>
>> news:microsoft.public.windowsxp.photos
>
>
> This is only thing that makes good sense here :)
>
> regards,
> Sam.
>
>
>> or
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2tqj2d
>>
>>