db ´¯`·.. ><)))º>` .. . wrote:
> actually, it is a basic
> toy and not a super toy
> but the quality of the pic
> also plays a factor.

You don't make any sense here at all. Either the utility works on JPEG
images losslessly or it doesn't. The quality of the picture has nothing
to do with it.



> if there is some losslessly,
> then you might try a
> graphics program that
> can modify the pics and
> provide gainfullness.
> here is a listing:
>
> http://www.cameratown.com/software/


Thanks, but this is quite irrelevant here.


>
> you can also get more
> help on photos by posting
> your questions here:
>
> news:microsoft.public.windowsxp.photos


This is only thing that makes good sense here :)

regards,
Sam.


> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2tqj2d
>
>
>