sk8r-365 wrote:
> Information about broken links is good to know ... did you miss the
> part in the FAQ about top-posting?

Of course not. I read through the whole thing, but I also clicked on the
first of the two links below the top-posting section, which mentioned
reading's flow going from "left to right and from top to bottom". I
figured that putting the broken link below my text would make my
sentence flow more. Unfortunately, I only read the first clause below
section 2.3's header, so I didn't catch the part that it's standard and
that people expect posts to be in chronological order. Mea culpa!