"the wharf rat" <wrat@panix.com> wrote in message
news:fkkhs4$2bl$1@reader1.panix.com...[color=blue]
>
> This is an example of the kind of thinking I'm describing when
> I say things like the whole uac thing is meant to generate warm fuzzies
> in the marketing department and to cover microsoft's ass. Check out
>
> [url]http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1020271&SiteID=1&mode=1[/url]
>
> for an explanation of some of the problems with cygwin on vista,
> and then be sure to open
>
> [url]http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/6/a/56a0ed11-e073-42f9-932b-38acd478f46d/WindowsVistaUACDevReqs.doc[/url]
>
> and read the section on installer detection on page 13. This
> is a security system????
>[/color]

I decided to read one of your post again. I am disappointed here with your
inability to change gears out of *1st* gear and move on.

Is this all your posts are about, either DRM or UAC?