A more experienced reader will stop right at the second paragraph where the
author used predicted sales figure from IDC for the current user number and
the following conclusions can be made:

(1) either the author doesn't have basic business knowledge and thus doesn't
know what he is talking about, or (2) the author is twisting the fact, or
(3) both.

For an experienced reader, the second paragraph actually is the conclusion
of the entire article and anything further is a waste of time.

Personally, I couldn't care less about the actual user number nor sales
figure. I also respect and accept each and every one's positive and
negative experience, but don't treat the general public as a fool.

If one is not confident enough for his/her own decision, don't bother to
write.


"dzomlija" <dzomlija.30e9l4@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message
news:dzomlija.30e9l4@no-mx.forums.net...[color=blue]
>
> DX;520607 Wrote:[color=green]
>> You really are full of yourself aren't you.
>>
>> IMHO it was a poor review.[/color]
>
> You have obviously not read it, have you? Either that, or you read it
> with a biased optinion that contradicts what Andre wrote.
>
> Get a life, why don't you?
>
>
> --
> dzomlija
>
> ____________________________________
> Peter Alexander Dzomlija
> Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? -And as
> you die, so shall I be Reborn-...
>
> - ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe
> - AMD Atlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+
> - 4GB DDR400
> - ASUS nVidia 6600
> - Thermaltake Tai-Chi Watercooled Chassis
> - 1207GB Total Formatted Storage
> - Vista Ultimate x64
> - CodeGear Delphi 2007'http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/'
> ([url]http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/[/url])[/color]