rtk wrote:[color=blue]
> "The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"
> <none@none.not> wrote in message news:ffui2k$ur9$2@aioe.org...[color=green]
>> rtk wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uQuZ#EFGIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Cal Bear '66 wrote:
>>>>> New BETA nVidia Graphics Drivers (ver. 169.01 26 October 2007):
>>>>>
>>>>> [url]http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_169.01.html[/url]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I Bleed Blue and Gold
>>>>> GO BEARS!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> NVIDIA Itself Is In Beta, Boycott NVIDIA Whenever Possible, And Use
>>>> ATI Products Powered By AMD Instead, Just FYI.
>>>
>>> You do realize that no self respecting Linux user would suggest ATI
>>> over nVidia, right?
>>>
>>> Might want to jump back onto the ubuntu groups for a while.
>>>
>>> rtk[/color]
>>
>> Actually since AMD has taken over ATI, their linux support has gotten
>> alot better. It may not rival nvidia yet, but I'm glad to see the
>> improvement.[/color]
>
> Agreed, although my x1600 "red screens" on 7.10 on first boot, least it
> would complete the install on Feisty.
>
> Really, I was just out to point at another example of how kevpan
> obviously doesn't represent the Linux community.
>
> rtk[/color]

ATI's Windows Vista RTM Device Drivers Are Light Years Ahead Of NVIDIA's
Windows Vista RTM Device Drivers, Which Is What I Was Referring To, Just
FYI. Eventually ATI Will Catch Up On Their Linux Device Drivers As Well,
Considering The Fact That They Are Now Owned By AMD, Just FYI.