Vista 64-bit has always been "ready for primetime" - it's the hardware
manufacturers who are behind the eight-ball. Personally, I don't recommend
that anyone use 64-bit Windows unless they need to ... and if they need to,
they know they need to.

I have no idea what "memory delta" you're talking about - I've seen no such
comparing 32-bit and 64-bit Windows on the same hardware platform.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] [email]rgharper******.com[/email]
* NEW! Catch my blog ... [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/[/url]
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* The Website - [url]http://rgharper.mvps.org/[/url]
* HELP us help YOU ... [url]http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm[/url]


"Milhouse Van Houten" <btvs@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:uSvmPFwCIHA.4444@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> In terms of driver availability and application compatibility? In other
> words, is it still a fight or are the devices and applications it doesn't
> work with now down to the obscure? The latest evaluation of it I can find
> is many months out-of-date.
>
> Also, does anyone know the memory delta on average between it and 32-bit?
> I know it takes more but am not sure how much.[/color]