Your very first sentence defines you.

You made an assumption that anyone who replied to your post would be a
"vista troll", which means either (a) you are a troll deliberately trying to
start arguments, (b) you don't even know what a *troll* is, or (c) you're
lost and didn't notice the Vista sign on the door.

Well? Troll, ignorant or illiterate?

Then you made another assumption that I somehow suggested you acted in a
troll-like manner based on the fact that you posted a link.

Again, you were mistaken, suggesting you're either a troll, ignorant or
illiterate.

"carl feredeck" wrote in message news:46995189$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=blue]
> So reporting a glitch is an act of a troll? LOL you are crazy!
> NO! wait.. you are a troll!
>
> "KristleBawl" wrote in message...[color=green]
>> No, "a vista troll" would be posting pro-Vista slogans in any non-Vista
>> newsgroup.
>>
>> You think you won't get replies from people using and enjoying Vista?
>> Then why did you post a link to some blog with a short story about a
>> Vista glitch while visiting a Microsoft Vista newsgroup.
>>
>> Gee, you must be one of the sharpest spoons in the drawer! <g>
>>
>> "carl feredeck" wrote in message news:46994456@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=darkred]
>>> If you attack me for just posting this, then you are a troll.. a
>>> vista troll. Learn to accept that vista is not perfect... it is very
>>> faaaaaaaaaaaaaaar from perfect! Vista is NOT a God to be worshiped![/color][/color][/color]