On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:10:22 +0200, "P. Di Stolfo"
<paolodistolfo********.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hello,
> yes, sorry, I was just thinking into this sole direction that I left out all
> the other possibilities.[/color]


Yes, it sounded like you understood. I just wanted to set the record
straight, lest anyone be confused.


[color=blue]
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.am.invalid.domain> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:77ml73hmkhfkct8lpkc3orc1nb9lsl4kce@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:19:04 +0200, "P. Di Stolfo"
> > <paolodistolfo********.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> could it be that your hard drives are built in a RAID? This would mean
> >> that
> >> your data is mirrored onto the second drive for data security and
> >> therefore
> >> there are only 250 GB available.[/color]
> >
> >
> > Lest this confuse anybody, that is *not* strictly correct. There is
> > more than one kind of RAID. What you are describing is called RAID1,
> > or mirroring. RAID0, on the other hand, or striping, is not redundant,
> > and does not work the way you describe.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup[/color][/color]

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup