"Patrick Schmid [MVP]" wrote:

> Most users have no real reason to use the 64-bit version of Vista
> instead of the 32-bit one, so I would recommend to just stick with the
> 32 bit.

Except for the vastly improved security and reliability you mean? At home I
have two *identical* machines, only one has to run 32 bit because it needs a
wireless usb connection, and guess which fails to shut down properly, and
locks up for periods for no reason.

Read http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...sta_ff_x64.asp

I can't believe an MVP would be saying "Oh, 32bit isn't important." We have
*one* 32bit PC in our office. The rest of us are 64bit XP or Vista.


* CIO's want 64bit because its vastly more secure (Address Space Layout
Randmonizer, NX, Hardware DEP, Enforced driver signing)
* Our customers need 64bit because we blow 2Gb in a heartbeat.
* Gamers want 64bit because it breaks the 2Gb limit and runs much faster.
* Home users don't like it because of a lack of drivers.

So what does Microsoft do? NOT PROVIDE DRIVERS FOR 64Bit OneNote! Good
example guys.