XPsp2 is far more stable than Vista.

sp3 is just to help people slipstream it and avoid the 70 patch download
each time they install XP.
But you know all about that? Or dont you? No?

They might add a few new tricks too but I dont expect much... especialy if
they add ANYTHING they have in vista it
will be a disaster....

I can forgive ie7 and wmp11.... but if they add defender or windows
search...or other hideous things vista has..

then I guess I wont be saying only vista sucks.. but XP sucks too....




"Justin" <None@None.com> wrote in message
news:eX2oppvnHHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> "Tiberius" <James@tiberius.kirk> wrote in message
> news:u$nlV2knHHA.1240@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> There were rumors that perhaps there would never be a sp3[/color]
>
> You believe rumors? If not then SP3 has always been planned for release.
> If so then that explains a few things.
>
> Also, you claim to have posted this info in some effort to prove that XP
> can be MORE STABLE (?) thus a WANT to stay with XP? SP3 will do nothing
> to make XP more stable or any better then it already is. It's just a
> compilation of what is already available. SP3 will mostly benefit IT
> professionals so they can re-install XP without a large sum of updates to
> follow.[/color]