| A Search on PNutts Reveals Homogenously Twitt Posts Period! No Vista sutstance. Unfortunately for you Pnutss a search on your name reveals not one single
substantive on point post on how to use Windows, hardware, or software.
It's your own personal Twitt blog. As usual those who try to posture as
elite, discerning, sophisticated group users contribute nothing but
complaints--not one substantive question on Vista or one substantive answer
shows up in a PNUTTS View>Find. Why am I not surprised? That's par.
You can call names--Twitt. Mommy sent you outta the house and said "I"m not
goin' with you little Nutt go hit the bully by yourself" and after he
knocked you on your ass you dusted yourself off and said at least the little
Nutt tried.
But we even help Pnutt Twits on these groups who don't want to admit what
newbies they are.
You have to ask a question to get help little Nutt. When you do you'll get
an anwer.
Rick's post is correct as to settling down and focusing on issues--and in
the case of Vista it was foreplayed with huge fanfair and like a large
number of foreplays that were promised to be a big bang, it followed with an
awkward, erratic whimper, with a lot of impaired functionality and a large
number of people were surprised that it was so disappointing in so many
respects. Some major features don't work well, but it has a very decent
backup and you image anyway right?
You'll find out when you try to recover with Startup Repair.
CH
"PNutts" <pnutterfield********.com> wrote in message
news:F78F87F6-75F7-462C-A27B-DD9222D269D7@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Agreed. I must be getting less tolerant as I get older. :) I remember the
> same behavior with the XP newsgroups - complaints of no drivers,
> reportedly
> slower, critical bugs not fixed, not ready for release, people trying to
> solve world hunger, etc.
>
> Occasionally I hear of rouge or loose cannon moderators, but the boards
> with
> any credibility usually do a good job of self-policing the activities,
> including those of the moderators. And when the checks and balances fail,
> I
> remind myself that either: 1. I don't have a right to post and not have it
> deleted; or 2. I have a right to post and the moderator has a right to
> delete
> it for any reason including personal ones.
>
> Thank you for the thoughtful reply.
>
> "Rick Rogers" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Hi,
>>
>> A high signal to noise ratio is normal for a new product as everyone
>> plasters their opinion about everything. Like other OS groups, this one
>> will
>> settle down as Vista progresses. Keep in mind that in monitored groups,
>> all
>> posts are subjected to the scrutiny of the moderator. If he/she doesn't
>> like
>> what you write (be it right, wrong, or just plain indifference), then it
>> doesn't get posted and you have no way to dispute it.
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> [url]http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/[/url]
>> Windows help - [url]www.rickrogers.org[/url]
>>
>> "PNutts" <pnutterfield********.com> wrote in message
>> news:1005AD8D-BBAE-4533-B5CC-B9A8FFFC3414@microsoft.com...[color=darkred]
>> > The subject line says it all. It used to be amusing to lurk this
>> > newsgroup,
>> > but the noise killed the signal. Now the same trolls fight the same
>> > windmills
>> > every day. I'm going to hang around and see how the dust settles, but
>> > I'm
>> > looking to discuss Vista in a technical group.
>> >
>> > I do realize that unfortunately, some of the posters here copy their
>> > tiatribes verbatim to other forums. You'll see evidence of this in long
>> > rambling responses that cover many topics except for the thread being
>> > discussed (with the exception of the first line or two). I wish all
>> > that
>> > anger and energy was directed to effect change instead of wearing out a
>> > keyboard.[/color]
>>
>>[/color][/color] |