I'm not sure how Leo LaPorte would take to this new name, though...


"Jane C" <jellybean@nospam.xjgarage.org> wrote in message
news:CC234D3D-8AD9-4781-B806-A5FB94AB3586@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> "Twit filter" has a much nicer ring to it than "killfile" ;-)
>
> --
> Jane, not plain ;) 64 bit enabled :-)
> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation ;-)
> "Bill" <bill@c.a> wrote in message
> news:LoadnTE01f0XhP3YnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@golden.net...[color=green]
>> "PNutts" <pnutterfield********.com> wrote in message
>> news:74472030-D0A2-44FE-B492-1DE7204CFA32@microsoft.com...[color=darkred]
>>> Good response! Unfortunately, not only am I using a browser to access
>>> this
>>> group as a personal preference, the trusty kill file passes responses by
>>> "the
>>> good guys" who are responding to the drivel.[/color]
>>
>> I'm not familiar with how that filter would work in your setup, but
>> normally only the post from the twit is filtered from view. All responses
>> from other people are still visible.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Twit filter"... That kills me![/color]
>>
>> I don't know came up with that name, but it's a good one.
>>
>> :-)
>>[/color]
>[/color]