are you getting any performance issue warning on the advanced tools?

"Peter" wrote:
[color=blue]
> I'm only changing it to get a higher rating in Vista which currently sits at
> 3.1 plus the better performance anyway.
> 9550's are quite good despite all.
>
> --
> Peter
> Toronto, Canada
> XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate
> P4 HT @ 3.00ghz, 4.0gb RAM, 700gb HDD
>
> "GT" <GT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1BD460BA-A9DF-4BDD-BFFA-2163EDEE725F@microsoft.com...[color=green]
> >I just purchase Ati 9550 graphic card 2 days ago and thinking of returning
> >in
> > favor of X1050 or X1300 series. I have at least 30 days to return it from
> > circuitcity.
> >
> > "Peter" wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> I'm using Vista's own...haven't bothered with 7.2 as I'm about to change
> >> my
> >> video card anyway to an ATI Radeon X1650 Pro in the nbext few weeks.
> >> I'm puzzled, are my figures worse than yours...I have no idea how this
> >> stuff
> >> works.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Peter
> >> Toronto, Canada
> >> XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate
> >> P4 HT @ 3.00ghz, 4.0gb RAM, 700gb HDD
> >>
> >> "GT" <GT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:5917D7E1-9A89-4361-9E64-FD4FCDBE28A2@microsoft.com...
> >> > 319
> >> > 256
> >> > 0
> >> > 63
> >> >
> >> > I had that also when i only have the display driver installed that was
> >> > included on Window Vista and the one in Window Update. I installed
> >> > Catalyst®
> >> > 7.2 Display Driver for Windows Vista (32 bit) and everything just
> >> > change
> >> > from:
> >> >
> >> > 767 MB
> >> > 256mb
> >> > 0MB
> >> > 511mb
> >> >
> >> > Do you have the Catalyst 7.2 display driver for Windows Vista 32 bit
> >> > installed or are you using the Display driver included on Window Vista
> >> > or
> >> > Window Update.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Peter" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I have the same card and the figures are:
> >> >> 319
> >> >> 256
> >> >> 0
> >> >> 63 respectively.
> >> >> I have 4gb of RAM onboard which reports at 2920mb only and I assume
> >> >> that
> >> >> my
> >> >> video and TV-FM cards absorb the rest.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Peter
> >> >> Toronto, Canada
> >> >> XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate
> >> >> P4 HT @ 3.00ghz, 4.0gb RAM, 700gb HDD
> >> >>
> >> >> "GT" <GT@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:229C36AC-BC77-4967-9AF2-1897CF7C2FE2@microsoft.com...
> >> >> > P4 2.8ghz HT, 1.5gb, 160gb HD, Ati Radeon 9550 256mb AGP 8x
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In Personalize, display settings, advance settings it display that i
> >> >> > have:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Total Available Graphic Memory 767 MB,
> >> >> > Dedicated Video Memory 256mb
> >> >> > System Video Memory 0MB
> >> >> > Shared System Memory 511mb
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Does every Video card use shared system Memory? I thought by buying
> >> >> > 9550
> >> >> > it
> >> >> > would not use my computer memory but in the dispaly setting, advance
> >> >> > setting
> >> >> > is showing Shared System Memory 511mb, is this normal on all video
> >> >> > card.
> >> >> > Any
> >> >> > recommendation on video card that does not uses computers memory?
> >> >> > How
> >> >> > about
> >> >> > Visiontek Ati Radeon X1300 512mb AGP 8x?
> >> >> > [url]http://www.visiontek.com/products/cards/retail/x1300_512agp.html[/url]
> >> >>
> >>[/color][/color]
>[/color]