Le Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:57:08 +0100, Milan Babuskov a écrit*:

> Roy.Schestowitz******.com wrote:
>> they both suck
>
> That doesn't sound like a "difference" to me?
>
> If you want to learn about real difference, read here:
>
> http://swoes.blogspot.com/2006/07/kde-vs-gnome.html
That's true at both sucks.
gnome have less bugs as kde, but kde have more possibilities of settings.

As example, I will never use gnome because I just cannot configure the
mouse to work as I want it. And I don't use kde anymore because I don't
like to have to fight against undocumented features in order to get things
to work the way I like it.

It you want an outstanding wm with infinite and well documented features,
look for fvwm. If you want more as a wm, a DE (desktop environement), look
for fvwm-crystal.

If you have the patience to learn it (fvwm-crystal is
fvwm, but much more easier to learn because it just work from the first
run and have a modular configuration), I am sure at you will like it and
look at gnome and kde with a little smile on your face.

Dominique