oops. replied to the wrong post. PLS ignore.

"Bill Yanaire" <BillYanaire@viceman.com> wrote in message
news:eh2$TsueHHA.4944@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Yuturyryw jnyoipj bcbderwq sksytrterw mmspoiy AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN
> ON!
>
>
> <.> wrote in message news:OqnempueHHA.4308@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> Office 95 works. There are compat shims applied to all of Office 2002
>> (which was called XP), the same ones for 2003 which basicallly turn off
>> UI stuff on terminal server and doesn't let DWN rescale it's windows.
>> "WGD" <wgd.roaming@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:LJxSh.3867$SK3.3520@trnddc03...[color=darkred]
>>>A technically-oriented representative at one of the nation's large 'box'
>>>houses suggested that:
>>>
>>> 1. I stay w/XP-MCE, that Vista (Premium) still has a lot of problems
>>> 2. Vista is NOT compatible with Office 2002, that trying to get Office
>>> 2002 to work with Vista will be a serious challenge thus requiring an
>>> upgrade to Office 2003 (minimally) or Office 2007.
>>> 3. Office 2007 is NOT compatible with XP-MCE (should reverting back to
>>> XP be necessary)
>>> 4. Once upgrading to Vista is accomplished, that reverting back to
>>> XP-MCE will require a total restore.
>>>
>>> Comments from those experienced with these questions/problems will be
>>> greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> WayneD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]