| Re: Fastest performance, best value? Too bad he doesn't keep it to himself. A self-aggrandizing malcontent of the
first order.
Lang
"David Hankinson" <DavidHankinson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:400D1F64-455B-4E63-B0BA-5CDF5E7D8C4A@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> You're right, John, it's YOUR advice.
>
> David
>
>
> "John Jay Smith" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Your advice is dangerous.. in fact he should sue you for such stupid
>> suggestions. Get a life and a computer education before you say such
>> blundering nonsense.
>>
>> My advice is keep away from vista and office 2007.
>>
>>
>> "KL" <noname@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:OWxMJE87GHA.244@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=darkred]
>> >
>> > You can run it on your current machine but for the future dual core (or
>> > more) is certainly the way to go, it just makes sense considering the
>> > amount of multitasking even an average user has. Also, 64 bit is
>> > absolutely necessary, there are just so many limitations in 32bit to be
>> > feasable in the future although it wil of course take a long time
>> > before
>> > everything is 64 bit.
>> >
>> > About Access, currently there is no 64 bit odbc access driver, meaning
>> > if
>> > you have applications that depend on it (for example classic asp pages
>> > running on a dev machine) you might have a problem switching to 64 bit,
>> > although Access itself works just fine.
>> >
>> > KL.
>> >
>> >
>> > "Brossyg" <Brossyg@discussions.microsoft.com> skrev i meddelandet
>> > news:D1361F0E-8B70-4F3D-81CC-80AE98EF40CA@microsoft.com...
>> >>I am currently running XP Pro 32-bit with a 3 gig Pentium 4 with 1 gig
>> >>of
>> >>RAM
>> >> in a SOHO environment. My most taxing app is MS Access running a 250
>> >> meg
>> >> database with lots of bells & whistles. The database regularly uses
>> >> 100+% of
>> >> my CPU. The rest of the apps are pretty standard Office apps. I rip
>> >> CDs
>> >> often with Win Media Player 11, which uses 100+% of my CPU.
>> >>
>> >> I would describe myself as a "practical" early-adopter, but not a
>> >> gearhead.
>> >> ....
>> >
>> >[/color]
>>
>>
>>[/color][/color] |