ghstbstr spake thusly on 2/24/2007 1:03 AM:
[color=blue]
>
>
> "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
> news:%23TOxV89VHHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1].
>>
>> If you've got Firefox set to check for and install updates
>> automatically, you'll find it won't work properly due to a
>> Vista-related bug. It checks, downloads the update and notifies you
>> to install, but the installation will fail without notice [2].
>>[/color]
>
> The Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 update just downloaded and after restate it
> worked just fine for me without any problems.[/color]

That it would, but did you happen to look at "About" under the help menu
to see what it says?

Does it tell you it's "2.0.0.2" (assuming you were using 2.0.x
previously). Mine still said 2.0.0.1 (till I fixed it, that is).

I'd read about this bug before which is why I checked after the update.
And as expected, the update failed (but you wouldn't know that - not
right away anyway).

--
Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.