| Re: Most thoroughly tested Microsoft Software ever? You are a developer and rushed to upgrade to Vista without going through the
newsgroups looking for issues on VS 2005 before upgrading? I have a machine
that has Vista on it (a test machine) but my work machine has XP and VS 2005
because I know it works. Yes, I have applied the patch to VS, but VS
doesn't behave properly so I can't rely on it for my day to day work.
If you had looked at the microsoft.public.dotnet.general or languages.vb
forums, you would see the postings regarding Vista and VS 2005. Keep your
Vista disk until they release SP1 and do a clean install of XP so you can
get back to work. There are too many issues to stay with Vista right now.
"jmathers" <jm********.com> wrote in message
news:m5fst2tdq2rhb97ch9en4k89b621i4i927@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> Isn't that what Bill said? And who the heck was doing the testing?
> Must have been the same people that are taking care of most technical
> support issues these daze.
> I can not believe that Visual Studio 2005 SP1 behaves the way it does
> in Vista; its a joke. Yeah, I know, there's a Beta patch for Vista
> users; and why would I apply anything Beta from Microsoft, when the
> production/live stuff doesn't work worth a crap. Currently I am dead
> in the water waiting for the VS patch for Vista, and all because I
> decided to upgrade to Vista. Wish I could get my money back. Funny
> thing is, I downloaded and ran the Vista upgrade advisor program that
> was supposed to tell me about these issues. Never reported a single
> issue until I actually started the upgrade process, then it told me
> that I needed to uninstall a number of programs. Visual Studio wasn't
> one of them. THe upgrade advisor never told me that the upgrade was
> going to throw away my current printer drivers, because there are no
> supported drivers for a printer I bought 1 year ago. HP has told me
> they will support the printer, it might be a while though. I guess
> everybody was in the dark here about when people might actually need
> this stuff.
>
> Its great to see all the old problems I used to experience, suddenly
> reappear. Like clicking on the recycle bin, emptying the trash, but
> the list stays there, although it says it emptied the trash.
>
> Is the UAC for real? I would imagine 99.9% of the users have turned
> this crap off. Is it OK to do this on virtually everything you try
> and do. I feel like my mother is watching and approving everything I
> do.
>
> Are users expected to debug the few gadgets that are out there? I
> have downloaded several of these and end up with errors when I reboot,
> asking me if I want to debug... Why the heck would I want a Weather
> gadget that never seems to update. What am I supposed to do with this
> debug information; maybe actually fix the Gadget? I know what
> happened; the people who worked on the OS also wrote some Gadgets!
>
> I'm not sure how to fix the IE message "The current web page is trying
> to open a site in your trusted sites" message. Jeez, I am on a
> Microsoft web site trying to look at the Gadgets. Love the navigation
> there also. I am looking for the new stuff, so maybe selecting last
> record and working backwards will work; NOT.
>
> I want names and numbers for the people responsible for this atrocity
> called Vista![/color] |