Maynard Handley wrote:
> In article <krmdnRsF8vsaIjDfRVn-gA@comcast.com>, <Rage6c> wrote:
>
> NEWSFLASH: Chip optimized for task X performs better at task X than chip
> optimized for task Y.
>
> Idiot.
>
While your _Newsflash_-statement stands undisputed, there is no need to
go ad hominem. At least not as long TOP500 is published on a
Linpack-score. :-)

KF