"Vlad-the-Impaler" <vlad@headsonastick.ow> wrote in message
news:4a462ea5@news.x-privat.org...[color=blue]
> "Canuck57" <fred@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:oxo1m.3775$oQ6.703@newsfe12.iad...[color=green]
>>
>> "Bill" <forgotit@work.net> wrote in message
>> news:zbo1m.16301$Xl4.2910@bignews5.bellsouth.net...[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>>> Linux has been tried retail...only Dell has the cojones to keep at it.
>>>> Though, they don't offer any support...only a link to an ubuntard
>>>> forum.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ubuntard ...HA what a great word. Added to spell checker :-)
>>>
>>> How come that Alias idiot got out? Isnt Ubuntard secure????[/color]
>>
>> More secure than MS-Windows, in a Vacouver hacking challenge MS-Vista
>> went down to the hackers before Ubuntu. In fact in one challenge Ubuntu
>> never got hacked.
>>[/color]
>
>
> Yeah, an intentionally unpatched Flash Player flaw...that if the hackers
> had wanted to, could have worked on the linux box.
> What protects most linsux systems is most users never even get flash
> player installed....they give up and go back to Vista or XP.[/color]

And once into the flash player it should have been jailed inside of IE, but
they bypassed the UAC. UAC is effective for users but not for coders. LOL.