On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:41:07 -0400, "Mike" <rathbunger@garbagemail.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>"+Bob+" <nomailplease@example.com> wrote in message
>news:1den45pdeal44ll1bst4m1ld6so2oeila4@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:36:11 -0400, "webster72n"
>> <webster72n******.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>>"+Bob+" <nomailplease@example.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ifjl45530q5vuooc8h25vgdht1f55sgje3@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:39:20 -0400, "webster72n"
>>>> <webster72n******.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>For a guy needing help you are quite feisty.
>>>>>You have to be precise when expecting help, not 'big-breasted'.
>>>>>
>>>>>Harry.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If he was a she and had big breasts, you'd be more than happy to help
>>>> a big-breasted poster.
>>>
>>>Now we're going somewhere, keep on tooting, or is it hooting?
>>>
>>>> Hooters trump everything.
>>>>
>>>> But you're right. He's a putz.
>>>>[/color]
>>
>> Or as a corralary - Is there any situation that a girl with nice
>> hooters would fail to improve? I think not.[/color]
>
>How about a room full of prettier girls with nicer hooters?[/color]

Well, I think you may have a point there. That's kind of like in
statistics when certainly approaches 1; you can't get any more certain
than that.