You're asking me to repeat things I already explained, you're mixing up
answers I gave to 2 different questions, and you're not following the
instructions (e.g. enabling printer pooling so you can select multiple
ports). All the information you need is in my two prior posts.
I mean no disrespect, but I think maybe you need to bring in some qualified
local assistance to set this up for you.
--

"cfman" <comtech.usa******.com> wrote in message
news:e$iu0LmFHHA.2296@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi GTS,
>
>> On the guest (PC O) this is what you need to do (I'm assuming the printer
>> driver is already installed on this guest PC) :
>> - In printer properties on the guest Share the printer and assign a share
>> name. (This seems counter intuitive but is required to set up printer
>> pooling.)
>> - Run ipconfig and note the guest PC's IP address.
>> NOTE - You should NOT be connected to RD at this point. Also, it
>> would be best to assign this PC a static address instead and use that.
>> - In a command prompt run >net use lpt3
>> \\xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx\printer-sharename /persistent:yes
>> (This could have been lpt 1 or 2 alternatively.)
>
>
> In your later message, you've used lpt3, should these be the same?
>
> Also, are you running this command on PC H, or PC O? If you run this on PC
> O, then the PC O is already connected to the printer through the wireless
> router, I am not sure why do you need to do this on PC O; if it is on PC
> H, then the IP address of the PC H (after using the wireless router) is a
> DHCP one assigned by the wirelss router, which is 192.168.1.107, which is
> not accessible by the PC H at all, since it is inside the office wireless
> router...
>
>
>> - Check printer pooling and select lpt3 as well as the TCP/IP port (which
>> I assume is presently selected) for the ports.
>
>
> Either on PC H or PC O, there is no way to select "lpt3 and TCP/IP port"
> together, whenever I select lpt3, the TCP/IP port will be unchecked...
>
> The PC H still prints to its physical local printer, which is actually
> non-existent, so it still could not print at all...
>
>