SG wrote:
> Inline...
>
>
> "Dave" <1@2.com> wrote in message
> news:jYOdnWEfvcJv27DVnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@giganews.com ...
>> SG wrote:
>>> Results 1 - 50 of about 543,000 for known norton problems with
>>> vista.
>>> http://www.google.com/search?num=50&...ems+with+vista
>>>
>>> Pick one :>)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You aren't performing a correct search with that link.
>
> Sure I am.
>
>> Your search has 5 separate key words. Any page containg those
>> words IN ANY ORDER will be picked up .
>
> I should have added about 5 more. The more I find to discourage
> anyone from using Norton the better they will be :>)
>
>>
>> Therefore not every page will describe a problem with Norton and
>> Vista. Click on the ' cached ' link on the bottom line of each
>> entry to see the words highlighted.
>
>
> Yep, use the cache a lot in my searches, but then also the real link
> to be sure the page hasn't been updated or changed.
>
>>
>> Try reading a few of the pages to see what I am talking about..
>
> No need, I've read all I want about Norton's Junkware Preformance
> hitting Bloated Crapware.
>
>>
>> A better approach would be to include quotes thus:
>> "norton with vista" or "norton and vista"
>>
> Never say those two words in the same sentence :>)

You are obviously too stupid to use Google to get any meaningful results.