Canuck57 wrote:

> "Frank" <fb@hit.olz> wrote in message
> news:OwC9PKutIHA.1316@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
>>Canuck57 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Moshe Goldfarb" <brick.n.straw******.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1tw6kma902o6m.wh4qs1u85wqu.dlg@40tude.net. ..
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:16:51 -0700 (PDT), carlie@linuxjournal.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Linux Journal is polling to find out how long people have individually
>>>>>been using Linux.
>>>>>http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/...een-linux-user
>>>>
>>>>They should add the word continuously into that survey because most
>>>>people:
>>>>
>>>>Try Linux
>>>>Dump Linux
>>>>Try Linux
>>>>Dump Linux
>>>>Try Linux
>>>>Dump Linux
>>>>
>>>>and over and over again each time hoping Linux has improved and they can
>>>>finally move off Windows.
>>>>
>>>>It hasn't happened for most yet based upon the 0.65 percent of desktop
>>>>market share Linux has.
>>>
>>>
>>>Been using it since Slackware days, 0.97p1 or so. Download from a BBS
>>>and make floppies for the install. Been running one version or another
>>>ever since. Which reminds me, Fedora 9 is out, and all the mirrors were
>>>plugged yesterday and the day before. Time to try again, no extra charge
>>>either. It is so popular even the 1GB links are plugged solid.
>>>
>>>But then, I have been UNIX literate for over 22 years. Unlike MS-Win
>>>fanboys I could put more in my brain than MS-FUD.
>>
>>Whats your problem canadian bacon, gotta start your MS hate bull****
>>campaign whenever linux is mentioned?
>>
>> Linux/UNIX is more secure
>>
>>>and more stable.
>>
>>Than what? Yesterdays versions?
>>
>> Part of the reason windows does not own the server market.
>>
>>Uh oh...I sense another lie coming!
>>
>>
>>>It just isn't stable and robust enough for some applications.
>>
>>Now you're showing your incompetence and stupidity to go along with your
>>inability to Vista running correctly.
>>
>>>One observation, Linux has always been technically superior to
>>>MS-Windows.
>>
>>Bull****! Is that why Windows owns the desktop world?
>>
>>
>>>But it just didn't come with a marketing machine and lobster dinners with
>>>the CIO.
>>
>>No, it came working out of the box the way people want an os to work.
>>
>> Linux now has a better and more capable than Vista interface
>>
>>>(Compiz) and is much faster, people should try it.
>>
>>Don't waste your time.
>>
>> Linux often had the same
>>
>>>technologies that MS-Windows uses, LDAP, Kerberos and even native TCP
>>>come to mind. Which of course Microsoft borrowed and bastardized. My
>>>current recommended distros are Ubuntu and Fedora.
>>
>>I'm starting to once again smell the bull**** coming out of your fat,
>>lying linux mouth.
>>
>>>You should see Compiz work, amazing. Windows done right. MS-Windows for
>>>boyz, X-Windows for men.
>>
>>Linux is for losers just like you!
>>
>>>Resistance is not futile. It is actually profitable.
>>
>>How many beers did it take for you to write this stupid diatribe?
>>Frank
>
>
> LOL. You are just another MS FUD going down.

The only place I'm going is to the bank and on vacation!

So how does it feel to
> sponsor a PoC like Vista?

I don't "sponsor" anything asshole...LOL!
Frank