Canuck57 wrote:

> "Moshe Goldfarb" <brick.n.straw******.com> wrote in message
> news:1tw6kma902o6m.wh4qs1u85wqu.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>>On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:16:51 -0700 (PDT), carlie@linuxjournal.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Linux Journal is polling to find out how long people have individually
>>>been using Linux.
>>>http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/...een-linux-user
>>
>>They should add the word continuously into that survey because most
>>people:
>>
>>Try Linux
>>Dump Linux
>>Try Linux
>>Dump Linux
>>Try Linux
>>Dump Linux
>>
>>and over and over again each time hoping Linux has improved and they can
>>finally move off Windows.
>>
>>It hasn't happened for most yet based upon the 0.65 percent of desktop
>>market share Linux has.
>
>
> Been using it since Slackware days, 0.97p1 or so. Download from a BBS and
> make floppies for the install. Been running one version or another ever
> since. Which reminds me, Fedora 9 is out, and all the mirrors were plugged
> yesterday and the day before. Time to try again, no extra charge either. It
> is so popular even the 1GB links are plugged solid.
>
> But then, I have been UNIX literate for over 22 years. Unlike MS-Win
> fanboys I could put more in my brain than MS-FUD.

Whats your problem canadian bacon, gotta start your MS hate bull****
campaign whenever linux is mentioned?

Linux/UNIX is more secure
> and more stable.

Than what? Yesterdays versions?

Part of the reason windows does not own the server market.

Uh oh...I sense another lie coming!

> It just isn't stable and robust enough for some applications.

Now you're showing your incompetence and stupidity to go along with your
inability to Vista running correctly.
>
> One observation, Linux has always been technically superior to MS-Windows.

Bull****! Is that why Windows owns the desktop world?

> But it just didn't come with a marketing machine and lobster dinners with
> the CIO.

No, it came working out of the box the way people want an os to work.

Linux now has a better and more capable than Vista interface
> (Compiz) and is much faster, people should try it.

Don't waste your time.

Linux often had the same
> technologies that MS-Windows uses, LDAP, Kerberos and even native TCP come
> to mind. Which of course Microsoft borrowed and bastardized. My current
> recommended distros are Ubuntu and Fedora.

I'm starting to once again smell the bull**** coming out of your fat,
lying linux mouth.
>
> You should see Compiz work, amazing. Windows done right. MS-Windows for
> boyz, X-Windows for men.

Linux is for losers just like you!
>
> Resistance is not futile. It is actually profitable.
>
>
How many beers did it take for you to write this stupid diatribe?
Frank